git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Elia Pinto <gitter.spiros@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, tboegi@web.de, ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com,
	gitster@pobox.com, sunshine@sunshineco.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 0/2] Implement the GIT_TRACE_CURL environment variable
Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 14:13:47 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160502181347.GB8439@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160502142813.50868-1-gitter.spiros@gmail.com>

On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 02:28:11PM +0000, Elia Pinto wrote:

> -  redo the authorization header skip with a replace of possible sensitive data. 
>    We prefer to print only:
>        09:00:53.238330 http.c:534              => Send header: Authorization:  <redacted>
>    intested of 
>        09:00:53.238330 http.c:534              => Send header: Authorization:  Basic(o other scheme) <redacted>
>    as it was done in the original proposed suggestion by Jeff King. 
>    This is because i think it's better not to print even the authorization scheme.

I'm not sure I agree. If you're debugging curl's auth selection, that's
omitting an important piece of data. And unlike the actual credential, I
don't think it's particularly secret (and in many cases can be deduced
from the "WWW-Authenticate" header the server sends, coupled with curl's
code).

>    We add also the (previously missing) proxy-authorization case

Good catch.

> In this series i keep the original curl_dump parsing code, even though it is 
> objectively difficult to read. This is because the same code is used internally by curl 
> to do "ascii-trace" and is also reported in the libcurl code examples and test. 
> I think this may make maintenance of code easier in the future (libcurl 
> new dev, new features and so on) 

I don't agree with this line of reasoning. The code in question is
purely about how we format the output buffer, not about parsing what
curl gives us. We _should_ be diverging if we prefer a different output
format. And I don't think it's a question just of readability (though I
do agree the existing one is hard to read); it also foils the redaction
of the authorization header.

-Peff

      parent reply	other threads:[~2016-05-02 18:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-02 14:28 [PATCHv5 0/2] Implement the GIT_TRACE_CURL environment variable Elia Pinto
2016-05-02 14:28 ` [PATCHv5 1/2] http.c: implement " Elia Pinto
2016-05-02 17:03   ` Ramsay Jones
2016-05-02 18:15   ` Jeff King
2016-05-02 18:59   ` Junio C Hamano
2016-05-02 19:25     ` Jeff King
2016-05-02 19:15   ` Junio C Hamano
2016-05-02 14:28 ` [PATCHv5 2/2] imap-send.c: introduce " Elia Pinto
2016-05-02 18:13 ` Jeff King [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160502181347.GB8439@sigill.intra.peff.net \
    --to=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=gitter.spiros@gmail.com \
    --cc=ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com \
    --cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
    --cc=tboegi@web.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).