From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH] utf8: fix duplicate words of "the" Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 09:09:22 -0400 Message-ID: <20160506130922.GA5051@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <1462537893-18493-1-git-send-email-lip@dtdream.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Li Peng X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri May 06 15:09:34 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ayfVd-0004Vc-QK for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 06 May 2016 15:09:34 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758731AbcEFNJ2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 May 2016 09:09:28 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([50.56.180.127]:35121 "HELO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1758274AbcEFNJ0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 May 2016 09:09:26 -0400 Received: (qmail 3360 invoked by uid 102); 6 May 2016 13:09:25 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Fri, 06 May 2016 09:09:25 -0400 Received: (qmail 28624 invoked by uid 107); 6 May 2016 13:09:38 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Fri, 06 May 2016 09:09:38 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 06 May 2016 09:09:22 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1462537893-18493-1-git-send-email-lip@dtdream.com> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 08:31:33PM +0800, Li Peng wrote: > Fix duplicate words of "the" in comment. Obviously a good change, along with the other one of mine you found. > --- > transport-helper.c | 2 +- > utf8.h | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) You seem to be breaking these up by file; was the change in transport-helper supposed to be in a different patch? IMHO it would be fine to just do all of these in a single patch. They're different files, yes, but it's all conceptually the same change. -Peff