From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: t6044 broken on pu Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 04:33:23 -0400 Message-ID: <20160509083323.GB14299@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <7d747193-7ba1-e274-86dc-427ed0f124c9@web.de> <878tzmrrfg.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <5618208c-ce45-d65c-abf8-498cfe0f2f84@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Junio C Hamano , Torsten =?utf-8?Q?B=C3=B6gershausen?= , Andreas Schwab , newren@gmail.com, Git Mailing List To: demerphq X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon May 09 10:40:00 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1azgdD-0003oH-Qx for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Mon, 09 May 2016 10:33:36 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751332AbcEIId1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 May 2016 04:33:27 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([50.56.180.127]:36172 "HELO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751167AbcEIId0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 May 2016 04:33:26 -0400 Received: (qmail 24305 invoked by uid 102); 9 May 2016 08:33:26 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Mon, 09 May 2016 04:33:26 -0400 Received: (qmail 17196 invoked by uid 107); 9 May 2016 08:33:39 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Mon, 09 May 2016 04:33:39 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 09 May 2016 04:33:23 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 08:30:51AM +0200, demerphq wrote: > > - perl -le 'print for $ARGV[0]..$ARGV[1]' -- "$@" > > + test_seq_counter__=$1 > > + while test "$test_seq_counter__" -le $2 > > + do > > + echo "$test_seq_counter__" > > + test_seq_counter__=$((test_seq_counter__ + 1)) > > + done > > } > > Is that perl snippet ever called with non-numeric output? > > perl -le 'print for $ARGV[0]..$ARGV[1]' -- A E > A > B > C > D > E I had that thought, too, but I think it would be an error to do so. test_seq is supposed to be a replacement for "seq", which does not understand non-numeric sequences. A quick "git grep test_seq" seems to back that up. -Peff