From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/3] tests: Adjust the configuration for Apache 2.2 Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 12:51:39 -0400 Message-ID: <20160509165139.GA10048@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <4a15c4e6c35cfb425da568d87e8b20b984e5325c.1462774709.git.johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> <20160509080315.GA14383@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20160509142711.GA9552@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Johannes Schindelin , git@vger.kernel.org, Lars Schneider To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon May 09 18:52:52 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1azoPL-0002HA-BW for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Mon, 09 May 2016 18:51:47 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752898AbcEIQvn (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 May 2016 12:51:43 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([50.56.180.127]:36409 "HELO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752789AbcEIQvm (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 May 2016 12:51:42 -0400 Received: (qmail 21136 invoked by uid 102); 9 May 2016 16:51:41 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Mon, 09 May 2016 12:51:41 -0400 Received: (qmail 21105 invoked by uid 107); 9 May 2016 16:51:55 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Mon, 09 May 2016 12:51:55 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 09 May 2016 12:51:39 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 09:42:32AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > Hopefully your patch to remove the -c ... sanitizing makes it to `master` > > soon, then I can submit my next iteration. > > Or we can just merge that "do not sanitize" branch in, and then > queue the "next iteration" which I'd assume would only be the test > addition? I think we'd also want the change to the test script to make sure that it fails with only a single header (Dscho's patch 2). -Peff