* [PATCH v5 1/2] builtin/apply: add 'lock_file' pointer into 'struct apply_state'
@ 2016-06-06 9:56 Christian Couder
2016-06-06 9:56 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] builtin/apply: move 'newfd' global " Christian Couder
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Christian Couder @ 2016-06-06 9:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: git
Cc: Junio C Hamano, Jeff King, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason,
Karsten Blees, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy, Stefan Beller, Matthieu Moy,
Eric Sunshine, Ramsay Jones, Christian Couder, Christian Couder
From: Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>
We cannot have a 'struct lock_file' allocated on the stack, as lockfile.c
keeps a linked list of all created lock_file structures.
Also 'struct apply_state' users might later want the same 'struct lock_file'
instance to be reused by different series of calls to the apply api.
So let's add a 'struct lock_file *lock_file' pointer into 'struct apply_state'
and have the user of 'struct apply_state' allocate memory for the actual
'struct lock_file' instance.
Let's also add an argument to init_apply_state(), so that the caller can
easily supply a pointer to the allocated instance.
Helped-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
---
This is to replace:
"[PATCH v3 48/49] builtin/apply: move 'lock_file' global into 'struct apply_state'"
from the "libify apply and use lib in am, part 1" patch series, and
"[PATCH v4 1/2] builtin/apply: add 'lock_file' pointer into 'struct apply_state'"
that was sent previously to replace v3 48/49 above.
See: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/296350/
The only change compared to v4 1/2 is that the comment above 'struct
lock_file *lock_file' in 'struct apply_state' has been replaced with a
much shorter one.
This 2 patch long patch series on top of the other unchanged commits
from v3 is available here:
https://github.com/chriscool/git/commits/libify-apply64
builtin/apply.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/builtin/apply.c b/builtin/apply.c
index 5027f1b..bbe0df1 100644
--- a/builtin/apply.c
+++ b/builtin/apply.c
@@ -52,6 +52,9 @@ struct apply_state {
const char *prefix;
int prefix_length;
+ /* These are lock_file related */
+ struct lock_file *lock_file;
+
/* These control what gets looked at and modified */
int apply; /* this is not a dry-run */
int cached; /* apply to the index only */
@@ -4547,7 +4550,7 @@ static int apply_patch(struct apply_state *state,
state->update_index = state->check_index && state->apply;
if (state->update_index && newfd < 0)
- newfd = hold_locked_index(&lock_file, 1);
+ newfd = hold_locked_index(state->lock_file, 1);
if (state->check_index) {
if (read_cache() < 0)
@@ -4648,11 +4651,14 @@ static int option_parse_directory(const struct option *opt,
return 0;
}
-static void init_apply_state(struct apply_state *state, const char *prefix)
+static void init_apply_state(struct apply_state *state,
+ const char *prefix,
+ struct lock_file *lock_file)
{
memset(state, 0, sizeof(*state));
state->prefix = prefix;
state->prefix_length = state->prefix ? strlen(state->prefix) : 0;
+ state->lock_file = lock_file;
state->apply = 1;
state->line_termination = '\n';
state->p_value = 1;
@@ -4705,6 +4711,8 @@ static void check_apply_state(struct apply_state *state, int force_apply)
}
if (state->check_index)
state->unsafe_paths = 0;
+ if (!state->lock_file)
+ die("BUG: state->lock_file should not be NULL");
}
static int apply_all_patches(struct apply_state *state,
@@ -4769,7 +4777,7 @@ static int apply_all_patches(struct apply_state *state,
}
if (state->update_index) {
- if (write_locked_index(&the_index, &lock_file, COMMIT_LOCK))
+ if (write_locked_index(&the_index, state->lock_file, COMMIT_LOCK))
die(_("Unable to write new index file"));
}
@@ -4852,7 +4860,7 @@ int cmd_apply(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
OPT_END()
};
- init_apply_state(&state, prefix);
+ init_apply_state(&state, prefix, &lock_file);
argc = parse_options(argc, argv, state.prefix, builtin_apply_options,
apply_usage, 0);
--
2.8.2.445.g4623162
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v5 2/2] builtin/apply: move 'newfd' global into 'struct apply_state'
2016-06-06 9:56 [PATCH v5 1/2] builtin/apply: add 'lock_file' pointer into 'struct apply_state' Christian Couder
@ 2016-06-06 9:56 ` Christian Couder
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Christian Couder @ 2016-06-06 9:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: git
Cc: Junio C Hamano, Jeff King, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason,
Karsten Blees, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy, Stefan Beller, Matthieu Moy,
Eric Sunshine, Ramsay Jones, Christian Couder, Christian Couder
From: Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>
To libify the apply functionality the 'newfd' variable should
not be static and global to the file. Let's move it into
'struct apply_state'.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
---
This is to replace:
"[PATCH v3 49/49] builtin/apply: move 'newfd' global into 'struct apply_state'"
from the "libify apply and use lib in am, part 1" patch series, and
"[PATCH v4 2/2] builtin/apply: move 'newfd' global into 'struct apply_state'"
that was sent previously to replace v3 49/49 above.
There is no change compared to both previous version except that this
patch should apply cleanly on top of PATCH v5 1/2.
builtin/apply.c | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/builtin/apply.c b/builtin/apply.c
index bbe0df1..b3eb704 100644
--- a/builtin/apply.c
+++ b/builtin/apply.c
@@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ struct apply_state {
/* These are lock_file related */
struct lock_file *lock_file;
+ int newfd;
/* These control what gets looked at and modified */
int apply; /* this is not a dry-run */
@@ -117,8 +118,6 @@ struct apply_state {
int applied_after_fixing_ws;
};
-static int newfd = -1;
-
static const char * const apply_usage[] = {
N_("git apply [<options>] [<patch>...]"),
NULL
@@ -4549,8 +4548,8 @@ static int apply_patch(struct apply_state *state,
state->apply = 0;
state->update_index = state->check_index && state->apply;
- if (state->update_index && newfd < 0)
- newfd = hold_locked_index(state->lock_file, 1);
+ if (state->update_index && state->newfd < 0)
+ state->newfd = hold_locked_index(state->lock_file, 1);
if (state->check_index) {
if (read_cache() < 0)
@@ -4659,6 +4658,7 @@ static void init_apply_state(struct apply_state *state,
state->prefix = prefix;
state->prefix_length = state->prefix ? strlen(state->prefix) : 0;
state->lock_file = lock_file;
+ state->newfd = -1;
state->apply = 1;
state->line_termination = '\n';
state->p_value = 1;
@@ -4779,6 +4779,7 @@ static int apply_all_patches(struct apply_state *state,
if (state->update_index) {
if (write_locked_index(&the_index, state->lock_file, COMMIT_LOCK))
die(_("Unable to write new index file"));
+ state->newfd = -1;
}
return !!errs;
--
2.8.2.445.g4623162
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-06-06 9:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-06-06 9:56 [PATCH v5 1/2] builtin/apply: add 'lock_file' pointer into 'struct apply_state' Christian Couder
2016-06-06 9:56 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] builtin/apply: move 'newfd' global " Christian Couder
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).