From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH] Adds *~ to the .gitignore Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 19:31:18 -0400 Message-ID: <20160609233118.GA25709@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <1465506629-16577-1-git-send-email-Lars.Vogel@vogella.com> <20160609213809.GA23059@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Lars Vogel , git@vger.kernel.org, Lars Vogel To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jun 10 01:31:31 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bB9QA-0006cB-6z for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 01:31:30 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751951AbcFIXbX (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jun 2016 19:31:23 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([50.56.180.127]:52191 "HELO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751902AbcFIXbW (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jun 2016 19:31:22 -0400 Received: (qmail 7573 invoked by uid 102); 9 Jun 2016 23:31:21 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2016 19:31:21 -0400 Received: (qmail 28639 invoked by uid 107); 9 Jun 2016 23:31:31 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2016 19:31:31 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 09 Jun 2016 19:31:18 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 03:48:12PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > As I said, however, I could support a move to add some selected > small number of common file extensions, as long as we have some > (social) mechanism to avoid churning this file every time somebody > new comes and complains their favourite editor or other tools are > not supported. Yeah, I don't mind it either, myself, provided we avoid the churn. OTOH, wouldn't somebody who cared about this want it for all of their projects? I guess I just don't see the point in making this a git-specific thing. -Peff