* [PATCH 0/2] t/perf tests against older versions @ 2016-06-22 19:39 Jeff King 2016-06-22 19:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] t/perf: fix regression in testing older versions of git Jeff King 2016-06-22 19:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] p4211: explicitly disable renames in no-rename test Jeff King 0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Jeff King @ 2016-06-22 19:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: git; +Cc: Johannes Schindelin One of the points of the t/perf suite is to be able to detect performance regressions between versions. But I don't think anybody really runs it systematically; we mostly just use it to show off our shiny new improvements. :) So I decided to run the suite against v2.0.0 and v2.9.0, to catch any regressions that have crept in the past few years. The good news is that there aren't any. But I did need a few patches to show that: [1/2]: t/perf: fix regression in testing older versions of git [2/2]: p4211: explicitly disable renames in no-rename test The first one fixes the issue I reported in [1], which let me run the suite against v2.0.0 at all. And the second fixes something that looks like a regression in the results, but really isn't. -Peff [1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/297875 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] t/perf: fix regression in testing older versions of git 2016-06-22 19:39 [PATCH 0/2] t/perf tests against older versions Jeff King @ 2016-06-22 19:40 ` Jeff King 2016-06-22 20:23 ` Johannes Schindelin ` (2 more replies) 2016-06-22 19:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] p4211: explicitly disable renames in no-rename test Jeff King 1 sibling, 3 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Jeff King @ 2016-06-22 19:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: git; +Cc: Johannes Schindelin Commit 7501b59 (perf: make the tests work in worktrees, 2016-05-13) introduced the use of "git rev-parse --git-path" in the perf-lib setup code. Because the to-be-tested version of git is at the front of the $PATH when this code runs, this means we cannot use modern versions of t/perf to test versions of git older than v2.5.0 (when that option was introduced). This is a symptom of a more general problem. The t/perf suite is essentially independent of git versions, and ideally we would be able to run the most modern and complete set of tests across many historical versions (to see how they compare). But any setup code they run is therefore required to use the lowest common denominator we expect to test. So let's introduce a new variable, $MODERN_GIT, that we can use both in perf-lib and in the test setup to get a reliable set of git features (we might change git and break some tests, of course, but $MODERN_GIT is tied to the same version of git as the t/perf scripts, so they can be fixed or adjusted together). This commit fixes the "--git-path" case, but does not mass-convert existing setup code to use $MODERN_GIT. Most setup code is fairly vanilla and will work with effectively all versions. But now the tool is there to fix any other issues we find going forward. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> --- t/perf/README | 12 ++++++++++-- t/perf/perf-lib.sh | 5 ++++- 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/t/perf/README b/t/perf/README index 8848c14..15986ca 100644 --- a/t/perf/README +++ b/t/perf/README @@ -115,8 +115,16 @@ After that you will want to use some of the following: At least one of the first two is required! -You can use test_expect_success as usual. For actual performance -tests, use +You can use test_expect_success as usual. In both test_expect_success +and in test_perf, running "git" points to the version that is being +peft-tested. The $MODERN_GIT variable points to the git wrapper for the +currently checked-out version (i.e., the one that matches the t/perf +scripts you are running). This is useful if your setup uses commands +that only work with newer versions of git than what you might want to +test (but obviously your new commands must still create a state that can +be used by the older version of git you are testing). + +For actual performance tests, use test_perf 'descriptive string' ' command1 && diff --git a/t/perf/perf-lib.sh b/t/perf/perf-lib.sh index 18c363e..4eb2536 100644 --- a/t/perf/perf-lib.sh +++ b/t/perf/perf-lib.sh @@ -52,6 +52,9 @@ TEST_NO_MALLOC_CHECK=t # need to export them for test_perf subshells export TEST_DIRECTORY TRASH_DIRECTORY GIT_BUILD_DIR GIT_TEST_CMP +MODERN_GIT=$GIT_BUILD_DIR/bin-wrappers/git +export MODERN_GIT + perf_results_dir=$TEST_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY/test-results mkdir -p "$perf_results_dir" rm -f "$perf_results_dir"/$(basename "$0" .sh).subtests @@ -81,7 +84,7 @@ test_perf_create_repo_from () { repo="$1" source="$2" source_git="$(git -C "$source" rev-parse --git-dir)" - objects_dir="$(git -C "$source" rev-parse --git-path objects)" + objects_dir="$("$MODERN_GIT" -C "$source" rev-parse --git-path objects)" mkdir -p "$repo/.git" ( cd "$source" && -- 2.9.0.204.g1499a7b ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] t/perf: fix regression in testing older versions of git 2016-06-22 19:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] t/perf: fix regression in testing older versions of git Jeff King @ 2016-06-22 20:23 ` Johannes Schindelin 2016-06-22 20:25 ` Johannes Schindelin 2016-06-22 20:46 ` Junio C Hamano 2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Johannes Schindelin @ 2016-06-22 20:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jeff King; +Cc: git Hi Peff, On Wed, 22 Jun 2016, Jeff King wrote: > Commit 7501b59 (perf: make the tests work in worktrees, > 2016-05-13) introduced the use of "git rev-parse --git-path" > in the perf-lib setup code. Because the to-be-tested version > of git is at the front of the $PATH when this code runs, > this means we cannot use modern versions of t/perf to test > versions of git older than v2.5.0 (when that option was > introduced). > > This is a symptom of a more general problem. The t/perf > suite is essentially independent of git versions, and > ideally we would be able to run the most modern and complete > set of tests across many historical versions (to see how > they compare). But any setup code they run is therefore > required to use the lowest common denominator we expect to > test. > > So let's introduce a new variable, $MODERN_GIT, that we can > use both in perf-lib and in the test setup to get a reliable > set of git features (we might change git and break some > tests, of course, but $MODERN_GIT is tied to the same > version of git as the t/perf scripts, so they can be fixed > or adjusted together). > > This commit fixes the "--git-path" case, but does not > mass-convert existing setup code to use $MODERN_GIT. Most > setup code is fairly vanilla and will work with effectively > all versions. But now the tool is there to fix any other > issues we find going forward. Thanks for beating me to it! Ciao, Dscho ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] t/perf: fix regression in testing older versions of git 2016-06-22 19:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] t/perf: fix regression in testing older versions of git Jeff King 2016-06-22 20:23 ` Johannes Schindelin @ 2016-06-22 20:25 ` Johannes Schindelin 2016-06-22 20:46 ` Junio C Hamano 2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Johannes Schindelin @ 2016-06-22 20:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jeff King; +Cc: git Hi Peff, On Wed, 22 Jun 2016, Jeff King wrote: > diff --git a/t/perf/README b/t/perf/README > index 8848c14..15986ca 100644 > --- a/t/perf/README > +++ b/t/perf/README > @@ -115,8 +115,16 @@ After that you will want to use some of the following: > > At least one of the first two is required! > > -You can use test_expect_success as usual. For actual performance > -tests, use > +You can use test_expect_success as usual. In both test_expect_success > +and in test_perf, running "git" points to the version that is being > +peft-tested. The $MODERN_GIT variable points to the git wrapper for the s/peft/perf/ Or s/peft/peff/. :-) The rest looks fine! Dscho ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] t/perf: fix regression in testing older versions of git 2016-06-22 19:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] t/perf: fix regression in testing older versions of git Jeff King 2016-06-22 20:23 ` Johannes Schindelin 2016-06-22 20:25 ` Johannes Schindelin @ 2016-06-22 20:46 ` Junio C Hamano 2016-06-22 20:48 ` Jeff King 2 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Junio C Hamano @ 2016-06-22 20:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jeff King; +Cc: git, Johannes Schindelin Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes: > So let's introduce a new variable, $MODERN_GIT, that we can > use both in perf-lib and in the test setup to get a reliable > set of git features (we might change git and break some > tests, of course, but $MODERN_GIT is tied to the same > version of git as the t/perf scripts, so they can be fixed > or adjusted together). I can see how this works for "git -C ... rev-parse ..." or any other built-in commands, but I am not sure if this is sufficient when any non-built-in command is used in the perf framework. How does it interact with GIT_EXEC_PATH we set in ../test-lib.sh that is dot-sourced by ./perf-lib.sh that everybody dot-sources? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] t/perf: fix regression in testing older versions of git 2016-06-22 20:46 ` Junio C Hamano @ 2016-06-22 20:48 ` Jeff King 2016-06-22 20:51 ` Junio C Hamano 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Jeff King @ 2016-06-22 20:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Junio C Hamano; +Cc: git, Johannes Schindelin On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 01:46:25PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes: > > > So let's introduce a new variable, $MODERN_GIT, that we can > > use both in perf-lib and in the test setup to get a reliable > > set of git features (we might change git and break some > > tests, of course, but $MODERN_GIT is tied to the same > > version of git as the t/perf scripts, so they can be fixed > > or adjusted together). > > I can see how this works for "git -C ... rev-parse ..." or any other > built-in commands, but I am not sure if this is sufficient when any > non-built-in command is used in the perf framework. How does it > interact with GIT_EXEC_PATH we set in ../test-lib.sh that is > dot-sourced by ./perf-lib.sh that everybody dot-sources? I didn't test it but it should work because we are pointing to bin-wrappers/git, which will override GIT_EXEC_PATH, and stick itself at the front of the PATH. -Peff ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] t/perf: fix regression in testing older versions of git 2016-06-22 20:48 ` Jeff King @ 2016-06-22 20:51 ` Junio C Hamano 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Junio C Hamano @ 2016-06-22 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jeff King; +Cc: git, Johannes Schindelin Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes: >> I can see how this works for "git -C ... rev-parse ..." or any other >> built-in commands, but I am not sure if this is sufficient when any >> non-built-in command is used in the perf framework. How does it >> interact with GIT_EXEC_PATH we set in ../test-lib.sh that is >> dot-sourced by ./perf-lib.sh that everybody dot-sources? > > I didn't test it but it should work because we are pointing to > bin-wrappers/git, which will override GIT_EXEC_PATH, and stick itself at > the front of the PATH. Ah, yes, bin-wrappers/git is not the real binary we just have built but overrides GIT_EXEC_PATH to point at the matching version. I forgot about that. Thanks. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] p4211: explicitly disable renames in no-rename test 2016-06-22 19:39 [PATCH 0/2] t/perf tests against older versions Jeff King 2016-06-22 19:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] t/perf: fix regression in testing older versions of git Jeff King @ 2016-06-22 19:40 ` Jeff King 1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Jeff King @ 2016-06-22 19:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: git; +Cc: Johannes Schindelin p4211 tests line-log performance both with and without "-M". In v2.9.0, the case without "-M" appears to have regressed badly, but that is only because we flipped on renames by default. Let's have the test explicitly disable renames to get consistent timings (and to match the presumed intent of the test, which is to see the effects with and without renames). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> --- t/perf/p4211-line-log.sh | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/t/perf/p4211-line-log.sh b/t/perf/p4211-line-log.sh index 3d074b0..b7ff68d 100755 --- a/t/perf/p4211-line-log.sh +++ b/t/perf/p4211-line-log.sh @@ -23,11 +23,11 @@ test_perf 'git log --follow (baseline for -M)' ' git log --oneline --follow -- "$file" >/dev/null ' -test_perf 'git log -L' ' - git log -L 1:"$file" >/dev/null +test_perf 'git log -L (renames off)' ' + git log --no-renames -L 1:"$file" >/dev/null ' -test_perf 'git log -M -L' ' +test_perf 'git log -L (renames on)' ' git log -M -L 1:"$file" >/dev/null ' -- 2.9.0.204.g1499a7b ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-06-22 20:52 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2016-06-22 19:39 [PATCH 0/2] t/perf tests against older versions Jeff King 2016-06-22 19:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] t/perf: fix regression in testing older versions of git Jeff King 2016-06-22 20:23 ` Johannes Schindelin 2016-06-22 20:25 ` Johannes Schindelin 2016-06-22 20:46 ` Junio C Hamano 2016-06-22 20:48 ` Jeff King 2016-06-22 20:51 ` Junio C Hamano 2016-06-22 19:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] p4211: explicitly disable renames in no-rename test Jeff King
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).