From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F0892018A for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 19:48:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752552AbcF1TsI (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jun 2016 15:48:08 -0400 Received: from dcvr.yhbt.net ([64.71.152.64]:54852 "EHLO dcvr.yhbt.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752426AbcF1TsH (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jun 2016 15:48:07 -0400 Received: from localhost (dcvr.yhbt.net [127.0.0.1]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24AEC2018A; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 19:48:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 19:48:04 +0000 From: Eric Wong To: Ioannis.Kappas@rbs.com Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: git svn clone segmentation faul issue Message-ID: <20160628194804.GA3653@dcvr.yhbt.net> References: <0BCA1E695085C645B9CD4A27DD59F6FA39AAD5CF@GBWGCEUHUBD0101.rbsres07.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0BCA1E695085C645B9CD4A27DD59F6FA39AAD5CF@GBWGCEUHUBD0101.rbsres07.net> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Ioannis.Kappas@rbs.com wrote: > Fortunately, a patch has already been submitted to subversion > with (github) revision > a074af86c8764404b28ce99d0bedcb668a321408 (at > https://github.com/apache/subversion/commit/a074af86c8764404b28ce99d0bedcb668a321408 > ) on the trunk to handle this and a couple of other similar > cases. But by the looks of it has not been picked up yet in > the latest subversion 1.9.4 release or the 1.9.x branch, > perhaps because this patch was identified in sanity checks > rather than coming out from a perceivable production issue? Thank you for documenting this. Curious, does this affect older SVN versions or only 1.9.x? I don't know Perl internals well or SWIG at all; so reports like these are very much appreciated.