Git development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr>,
	git@vger.kernel.org,
	Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
	Daniel Hahler <git@thequod.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rebase -i: restore autostash on abort
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 08:28:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160629062818.GA416@pks-pc.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqshvx6mpe.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1677 bytes --]

On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 02:13:49PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr> writes:
> 
> > It is "interesting" if you mean "matches real-life use-case", as it
> > corresponds to the case where the user killed the editor (as reported by
> > Daniel Hahler indeed, "Abort with ":cq", which will make Vim exit
> > non-zero").
> 
> Yes.  It is an interesting failure mode in that sense.  But breakage
> of such a basic mode is something an end-user is likely to notice
> immediately, so in that sense, having such a test alone is not all
> that interesting.

Well, given that the bug has been lingering since autostashing
has been implemented it seems users didn't catch the breakage as
fast ;) I guess it's just a little-used feature _or_ the breakage
is too obscure to regularly happen. At least I have never cause
my editor to return an error when editing the ISN-sheet.

But still, I agree that a test for conflicting autostashes is
beneficial, even though the scenario is even more unlikely (the
user's editor has to return an error code as well as that a
stashed file needs to be modified while editing the ISN-sheet).
I've just sent out a second version of the patch.

Thank you both for your input.

> > If you mean "likely to trigger nasty bugs", then indeed testing the case
> > when apply_autostash fails is interesting: for example, calling
> > die_abort when "stash apply" fails is tempting, but would lead to
> > infinite recursion (it doesn't seem to be the case, but a test would be
> > nice). Setting the editor to something that modifies uncommited-content
> > before 'false' should do the trick.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-29  6:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-28 17:57 [PATCH] rebase -i: restore autostash on abort Patrick Steinhardt
2016-06-28 19:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-06-28 20:42   ` Matthieu Moy
2016-06-28 21:13     ` Junio C Hamano
2016-06-29  6:28       ` Patrick Steinhardt [this message]
2016-06-29  6:21 ` [PATCH v2] " Patrick Steinhardt
2016-06-29 14:02   ` Johannes Schindelin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160629062818.GA416@pks-pc.localdomain \
    --to=ps@pks.im \
    --cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr \
    --cc=git@thequod.de \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox