From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "René Scharfe" <l.s.r@web.de>, "Johannes Sixt" <j6t@kdbg.org>,
"Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 3/5] archive-tar: write extended headers for file sizes >= 8GB
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 05:09:16 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160630090916.GC17463@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160630090614.GA16725@sigill.intra.peff.net>
The ustar format has a fixed-length field for the size of
each file entry which is supposed to contain up to 11 bytes
of octal-formatted data plus a NUL or space terminator.
These means that the largest size we can represent is
077777777777, or 1 byte short of 8GB. The correct solution
for a larger file, according to POSIX.1-2001, is to add an
extended pax header, similar to how we handle long
filenames. This patch does that, and writes zero for the
size field in the ustar header (the last bit is not
mentioned by POSIX, but it matches how GNU tar behaves with
--format=pax).
This should be a strict improvement over the current
behavior, which is to die in xsnprintf with a "BUG".
However, there's some interesting history here.
Prior to f2f0267 (archive-tar: use xsnprintf for trivial
formatting, 2015-09-24), we silently overflowed the "size"
field. The extra bytes ended up in the "mtime" field of the
header, which was then immediately written itself,
overwriting our extra bytes. What that means depends on how
many bytes we wrote.
If the size was 64GB or greater, then we actually overflowed
digits into the mtime field, meaning our value was
effectively right-shifted by those lost octal digits. And
this patch is again a strict improvement over that.
But if the size was between 8GB and 64GB, then our 12-byte
field held all of the actual digits, and only our NUL
terminator overflowed. According to POSIX, there should be a
NUL or space at the end of the field. However, GNU tar seems
to be lenient here, and will correctly parse a size up 64GB
(minus one) from the field. So sizes in this range might
have just worked, depending on the implementation reading
the tarfile.
This patch is mostly still an improvement there, as the 8GB
limit is specifically mentioned in POSIX as the correct
limit. But it's possible that it could be a regression
(versus the pre-f2f0267 state) if all of the following are
true:
1. You have a file between 8GB and 64GB.
2. Your tar implementation _doesn't_ know about pax
extended headers.
3. Your tar implementation _does_ parse 12-byte sizes from
the ustar header without a delimiter.
It's probably not worth worrying about such an obscure set
of conditions, but I'm documenting it here just in case.
Helped-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
---
archive-tar.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
t/t5000-tar-tree.sh | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/archive-tar.c b/archive-tar.c
index cb99df2..57a1540 100644
--- a/archive-tar.c
+++ b/archive-tar.c
@@ -18,6 +18,13 @@ static int tar_umask = 002;
static int write_tar_filter_archive(const struct archiver *ar,
struct archiver_args *args);
+/*
+ * This is the max value that a ustar size header can specify, as it is fixed
+ * at 11 octal digits. POSIX specifies that we switch to extended headers at
+ * this size.
+ */
+#define USTAR_MAX_SIZE 077777777777UL
+
/* writes out the whole block, but only if it is full */
static void write_if_needed(void)
{
@@ -137,6 +144,20 @@ static void strbuf_append_ext_header(struct strbuf *sb, const char *keyword,
strbuf_addch(sb, '\n');
}
+/*
+ * Like strbuf_append_ext_header, but for numeric values.
+ */
+static void strbuf_append_ext_header_uint(struct strbuf *sb,
+ const char *keyword,
+ uintmax_t value)
+{
+ char buf[40]; /* big enough for 2^128 in decimal, plus NUL */
+ int len;
+
+ len = xsnprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%"PRIuMAX, value);
+ strbuf_append_ext_header(sb, keyword, buf, len);
+}
+
static unsigned int ustar_header_chksum(const struct ustar_header *header)
{
const unsigned char *p = (const unsigned char *)header;
@@ -208,7 +229,7 @@ static int write_tar_entry(struct archiver_args *args,
struct ustar_header header;
struct strbuf ext_header = STRBUF_INIT;
unsigned int old_mode = mode;
- unsigned long size;
+ unsigned long size, size_in_header;
void *buffer;
int err = 0;
@@ -267,7 +288,13 @@ static int write_tar_entry(struct archiver_args *args,
memcpy(header.linkname, buffer, size);
}
- prepare_header(args, &header, mode, size);
+ size_in_header = size;
+ if (S_ISREG(mode) && size > USTAR_MAX_SIZE) {
+ size_in_header = 0;
+ strbuf_append_ext_header_uint(&ext_header, "size", size);
+ }
+
+ prepare_header(args, &header, mode, size_in_header);
if (ext_header.len > 0) {
err = write_extended_header(args, sha1, ext_header.buf,
diff --git a/t/t5000-tar-tree.sh b/t/t5000-tar-tree.sh
index 950bdd3..93c2d34 100755
--- a/t/t5000-tar-tree.sh
+++ b/t/t5000-tar-tree.sh
@@ -360,7 +360,7 @@ test_expect_success 'set up repository with huge blob' '
# We expect git to die with SIGPIPE here (otherwise we
# would generate the whole 64GB).
-test_expect_failure 'generate tar with huge size' '
+test_expect_success 'generate tar with huge size' '
{
git archive HEAD
echo $? >exit-code
@@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ test_expect_failure 'generate tar with huge size' '
test_cmp expect exit-code
'
-test_expect_failure TAR_HUGE 'system tar can read our huge size' '
+test_expect_success TAR_HUGE 'system tar can read our huge size' '
echo 68719476737 >expect &&
tar_info huge.tar | cut -d" " -f1 >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual
--
2.9.0.317.g65b4e7c
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-30 9:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-30 9:06 [PATCH v4 0/5] friendlier handling of overflows in archive-tar Jeff King
2016-06-30 9:07 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] t9300: factor out portable "head -c" replacement Jeff King
2016-07-01 4:45 ` Eric Sunshine
2016-07-01 17:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-01 18:01 ` Jeff King
2016-06-30 9:08 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] t5000: test tar files that overflow ustar headers Jeff King
2016-07-14 15:47 ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-07-14 16:45 ` Johannes Sixt
2016-07-14 17:08 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-14 20:52 ` Johannes Sixt
2016-07-14 21:32 ` Jeff King
2016-07-14 22:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-14 22:38 ` Jeff King
2016-07-15 13:37 ` Torsten Bögershausen
2016-07-15 13:46 ` Jeff King
2016-07-14 22:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-14 18:24 ` Jeff King
2016-07-14 18:21 ` Jeff King
2016-07-14 20:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-14 20:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-14 20:14 ` Jeff King
2016-07-14 20:09 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-14 20:10 ` Jeff King
2016-07-14 20:22 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-14 20:27 ` Jeff King
2016-07-14 20:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-14 20:43 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] ulong may only be 32-bit wide Junio C Hamano
2016-07-14 20:43 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] t0006: skip "far in the future" test when unsigned long is not long enough Junio C Hamano
2016-07-14 20:43 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] archive-tar: huge offset and future timestamps would not work on 32-bit Junio C Hamano
2016-07-14 22:20 ` Jeff King
2016-07-14 22:36 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-16 6:28 ` Duy Nguyen
2016-07-15 15:10 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] t5000: test tar files that overflow ustar headers Johannes Schindelin
2016-07-15 16:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-06-30 9:09 ` Jeff King [this message]
2016-07-14 16:48 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] archive-tar: write extended headers for file sizes >= 8GB Johannes Sixt
2016-07-14 17:11 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-14 18:16 ` Jeff King
2016-07-15 2:59 ` Torsten Bögershausen
2016-06-30 9:09 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] archive-tar: write extended headers for far-future mtime Jeff King
2016-06-30 9:09 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] archive-tar: drop return value Jeff King
2016-06-30 9:14 ` [PATCH v4 6/5] t5000: use test_match_signal Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160630090916.GC17463@sigill.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=j6t@kdbg.org \
--cc=l.s.r@web.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).