[PATCH v4 6/5] t5000: use test_match_signal

[Jeff King <peff@peff.net>]

On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 05:06:14AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:

> The one thing that isn't fixed is the use of "141" to test for sigpipe
> death. That should use test_match_signal, but that topic just got
> re-rolled, too.

And here's what the patch for that looks like (which can be applied if
this topic and jk/test-match-signal are merged).

-- >8 --
Subject: t5000: use test_match_signal

We are testing for sigpipe death from git, and doing so
portably requires using our test helper.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
---

Of course this does not help Windows at all, because we removed the "3"
check from jk/test-match-signal. So this new test will probably need to
be dealt with by Windows folks, one way or another (either extending
test_match_signal, or just skipping the exit code check under the MINGW
prereq).

 t/t5000-tar-tree.sh | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/t/t5000-tar-tree.sh b/t/t5000-tar-tree.sh
index 96d208d..6950d7d 100755
--- a/t/t5000-tar-tree.sh
+++ b/t/t5000-tar-tree.sh
@@ -365,8 +365,7 @@ test_expect_success 'generate tar with huge size' '
 		git archive HEAD
 		echo $? >exit-code
 	} | test_copy_bytes 4096 >huge.tar &&
-	echo 141 >expect &&
-	test_cmp expect exit-code
+	test_match_signal 13 "$(cat exit-code)"
 '
 
 test_expect_success TAR_HUGE 'system tar can read our huge size' '
-- 
2.9.0.317.g65b4e7c