From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "René Scharfe" <l.s.r@web.de>,
"Johannes Sixt" <j6t@kdbg.org>,
"Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] t5000: test tar files that overflow ustar headers
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 14:21:08 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160714182108.GB16497@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1607141745420.6426@virtualbox>
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 05:47:41PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jun 2016, Jeff King wrote:
>
> > The ustar format only has room for 11 (or 12, depending on
> > some implementations) octal digits for the size and mtime of
> > each file. For values larger than this, we have to add pax
> > extended headers to specify the real data, and git does not
> > yet know how to do so.
> >
> > [...]
> > t/t5000/19f9c8273ec45a8938e6999cb59b3ff66739902a | Bin 0 -> 2048 bytes
>
> It appears that this blob cannot be read when sizeof(unsigned long) == 4.
> This happens to break the t5000 test on Windows, where that comparison
> holds true.
>
> I am sure that I missed some other discussion about this issue... could
> you point me to it?
There's tons of discussion in:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/297409
but frankly it is not worth your time to read it. These tests are about
overflowing the tar limits, which can only happen with times and sizes
greater than 32-bits. The right thing to do is to skip the tests
entirely on systems where sizeof(unsigned long) is less than 8 (the
actual value is 64GB+1, so technically a 37-bit system would work, but I
think it is OK for the test-skipping to be less specific).
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-14 18:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-30 9:06 [PATCH v4 0/5] friendlier handling of overflows in archive-tar Jeff King
2016-06-30 9:07 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] t9300: factor out portable "head -c" replacement Jeff King
2016-07-01 4:45 ` Eric Sunshine
2016-07-01 17:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-01 18:01 ` Jeff King
2016-06-30 9:08 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] t5000: test tar files that overflow ustar headers Jeff King
2016-07-14 15:47 ` Johannes Schindelin
2016-07-14 16:45 ` Johannes Sixt
2016-07-14 17:08 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-14 20:52 ` Johannes Sixt
2016-07-14 21:32 ` Jeff King
2016-07-14 22:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-14 22:38 ` Jeff King
2016-07-15 13:37 ` Torsten Bögershausen
2016-07-15 13:46 ` Jeff King
2016-07-14 22:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-14 18:24 ` Jeff King
2016-07-14 18:21 ` Jeff King [this message]
2016-07-14 20:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-14 20:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-14 20:14 ` Jeff King
2016-07-14 20:09 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-14 20:10 ` Jeff King
2016-07-14 20:22 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-14 20:27 ` Jeff King
2016-07-14 20:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-14 20:43 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] ulong may only be 32-bit wide Junio C Hamano
2016-07-14 20:43 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] t0006: skip "far in the future" test when unsigned long is not long enough Junio C Hamano
2016-07-14 20:43 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] archive-tar: huge offset and future timestamps would not work on 32-bit Junio C Hamano
2016-07-14 22:20 ` Jeff King
2016-07-14 22:36 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-16 6:28 ` Duy Nguyen
2016-07-15 15:10 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] t5000: test tar files that overflow ustar headers Johannes Schindelin
2016-07-15 16:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-06-30 9:09 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] archive-tar: write extended headers for file sizes >= 8GB Jeff King
2016-07-14 16:48 ` Johannes Sixt
2016-07-14 17:11 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-07-14 18:16 ` Jeff King
2016-07-15 2:59 ` Torsten Bögershausen
2016-06-30 9:09 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] archive-tar: write extended headers for far-future mtime Jeff King
2016-06-30 9:09 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] archive-tar: drop return value Jeff King
2016-06-30 9:14 ` [PATCH v4 6/5] t5000: use test_match_signal Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160714182108.GB16497@sigill.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=j6t@kdbg.org \
--cc=l.s.r@web.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).