From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29A74203E1 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 18:53:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757121AbcG0SxA (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jul 2016 14:53:00 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([50.56.180.127]:50025 "HELO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1754303AbcG0SxA (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jul 2016 14:53:00 -0400 Received: (qmail 2802 invoked by uid 102); 27 Jul 2016 18:53:00 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 14:53:00 -0400 Received: (qmail 19588 invoked by uid 107); 27 Jul 2016 18:53:25 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 14:53:25 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 27 Jul 2016 14:52:56 -0400 Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 14:52:56 -0400 From: Jeff King To: Phil Pennock Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Schindelin Subject: [PATCH 0/2] t4205 style fixes Message-ID: <20160727185256.GA11657@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <20160727081414.GA21451@breadbox> <20160727175622.GA9961@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20160727181334.GA24224@tower.spodhuis.org> <20160727183203.GE32219@sigill.intra.peff.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160727183203.GE32219@sigill.intra.peff.net> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 02:32:03PM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > > This however was matching existing style for `head1` and `head2` a > > little above. I was somewhat surprised. > > Ah. Yeah, those are wrong and bad. We should fix that. So here's that fix, along with a style cleanup for the here-docs. [1/2]: t4205: drop top-level &&-chaining [2/2]: t4205: indent here documents Hopefully that provides a nicer base for building your patch on top of. -Peff