From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E99141FD99 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2016 22:29:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751518AbcHGW3F (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Aug 2016 18:29:05 -0400 Received: from dcvr.yhbt.net ([64.71.152.64]:59860 "EHLO dcvr.yhbt.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751492AbcHGW3E (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Aug 2016 18:29:04 -0400 Received: from localhost (dcvr.yhbt.net [127.0.0.1]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 885451FD99; Sun, 7 Aug 2016 22:29:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2016 22:29:03 +0000 From: Eric Wong To: Johannes Schindelin Cc: Junio C Hamano , Jeff Hostetler , git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Hostetler Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/9] status: collect per-file data for --porcelain=v2 Message-ID: <20160807222903.GA462@starla> References: <1470434434-64283-1-git-send-email-git@jeffhostetler.com> <1470434434-64283-5-git-send-email-git@jeffhostetler.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Johannes Schindelin wrote: > On Fri, 5 Aug 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > Jeff Hostetler writes: > > > } > > > - else > > > + else { > > > d->index_status = DIFF_STATUS_ADDED; > > > + /* Leave {mode,oid}_head zero for adds. */ > > > + d->mode_index = ce->ce_mode; > > > + hashcpy(d->oid_index.hash, ce->sha1); > > > + } > > > > Not a big deal (no need to resend for this one alone), but let's > > make the above properly formatted, i.e. > > > > if (ce_stage(ce)) { > > ... > > } else { > > ... > > } > > Do I understand correctly that your objections is against having the curly > brace before the "else" on its own line? > > If so, when did our coding style change? I vividly remember that we > strongly favored putting the "else" on a new line after a closing brace, > to make diffs nicer in case the braces were removed or added. AFAIK, Linux kernel CodingStyle has always been what Junio suggested (just w/o the trailing spaces :), and we inherit from that. https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/plain/Documentation/CodingStyle > BTW your suggestion has 24 extra spaces after the final closing brace ;-)