From: Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.org>
To: GitList <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v1 3/3] doc: rebase: clarify fixup! fixup! constraint
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2016 22:46:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160814214630.1312-4-philipoakley@iee.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160814214630.1312-1-philipoakley@iee.org>
22c5b13 (rebase -i: handle fixup! fixup! in --autosquash, 2013-06-27)
Signed-off-by: Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.org>
---
v1
the historical discussion about this is here
https://public-inbox.org/git/20130611180530.GA18488%40oinkpad.pimlott.net/
I certainly misunderstood what this meant. It sounded like only one fixup! was
allowed per commit (i.e. one mistake) - fixing two mistakes wouldn't be
allowed. Hindsight is a wonderful thing.
Also, does 'earliest commit requiring fixup/squash' fully convey that
its the one to fix.
---
Documentation/git-rebase.txt | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/git-rebase.txt b/Documentation/git-rebase.txt
index 66b789a..91eb107 100644
--- a/Documentation/git-rebase.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git-rebase.txt
@@ -425,9 +425,9 @@ without an explicit `--interactive`.
automatically modify the todo list of rebase -i
so that the commit marked for squashing comes right after the
commit to be modified, and change the action of the moved
- commit from `pick` to `squash` (or `fixup`). Ignores subsequent
- "fixup! " or "squash! " after the first, in case you referred to an
- earlier fixup/squash with `git commit --fixup/--squash`.
+ commit from `pick` to `squash` (or `fixup`). Commits with repeated
+ "fixup! " or "squash! " in the subject line are considered to refer
+ to the earliest commit requiring fixup/squash.
+
This option is only valid when the '--interactive' option is used.
+
--
2.9.0.windows.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-14 21:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-14 21:46 [PATCH v1 0/3] fixup fixup documenation Philip Oakley
2016-08-14 21:46 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] doc: commit: --fixup/--squash can take a commit revision Philip Oakley
2016-08-14 22:09 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-08-14 22:45 ` Philip Oakley
2016-08-14 22:55 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-08-14 23:29 ` Philip Oakley
2016-08-16 22:11 ` Philip Oakley
2016-08-14 21:46 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] doc: rebase: fixup! can take an object name Philip Oakley
2016-08-14 22:11 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-08-14 23:00 ` Philip Oakley
2016-08-14 23:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-08-14 23:30 ` Philip Oakley
2016-08-14 21:46 ` Philip Oakley [this message]
2016-08-14 22:20 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] doc: rebase: clarify fixup! fixup! constraint Junio C Hamano
2016-08-14 23:23 ` Philip Oakley
2016-08-15 15:42 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160814214630.1312-4-philipoakley@iee.org \
--to=philipoakley@iee.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).