From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE51920988 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2016 09:28:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754499AbcJQJ2q (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Oct 2016 05:28:46 -0400 Received: from smtprelay06.ispgateway.de ([80.67.18.29]:58598 "EHLO smtprelay06.ispgateway.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754223AbcJQJ2p (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Oct 2016 05:28:45 -0400 Received: from [88.217.180.208] (helo=book.hvoigt.net) by smtprelay06.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1bw4Dn-0004du-Sd; Mon, 17 Oct 2016 11:28:39 +0200 Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 11:28:38 +0200 From: Heiko Voigt To: Junio C Hamano Cc: Kevin Daudt , David Turner , "git@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: Uninitialized submodules as symlinks Message-ID: <20161017092838.GC43997@book.hvoigt.net> References: <20161013161017.GC29710@book.hvoigt.net> <20161013193558.GC1698@ikke.info> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Df-Sender: aHZvaWd0QGh2b2lndC5uZXQ= Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 09:48:16AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Kevin Daudt writes: > > > On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 06:10:17PM +0200, Heiko Voigt wrote: > >> On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 06:17:05PM +0000, David Turner wrote: > >> > Presently, uninitialized submodules are materialized in the working > >> > tree as empty directories. We would like to consider having them be > >> > symlinks. Specifically, we'd like them to be symlinks into a FUSE > >> > filesystem which retrieves files on demand. > >> > >> How about portability? This feature would only work on Unix like > >> operating systems. You have to be careful to not break Windows since > >> they do not have symlinks. > > > > NTFS does have symlinks, but you need admin right to create them though > > (unless you change the policy). > > That sounds like saying "It has, but it practically is not usable by > Git as a mechanism to achieve this goal" to me. Yes and that is why Git for Windows does not use them and I simplified to: "Windows does not have symlinks". For a normal user there is no such thing as symlinks on Windows, unfortunately. Cheers Heiko