From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 596A21F437 for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 00:21:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751125AbdAYAVU (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jan 2017 19:21:20 -0500 Received: from mail-pf0-f177.google.com ([209.85.192.177]:34681 "EHLO mail-pf0-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751118AbdAYAVT (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jan 2017 19:21:19 -0500 Received: by mail-pf0-f177.google.com with SMTP id e4so53359631pfg.1 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 16:21:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references; bh=07cgEOod3gwuxaF6KXto8wqlNPfORoTi/49JvPVRHPI=; b=OiPg4+SM/1EL0/IcFqVJTjFc9F13Grq6teIcLJ6h35qD0wgh4NpgUlbfE0maL1gJjO +IY/vfm7lSKOXufqa0nx9QX9FB/bgKXoEVxcthIXqgVZ3DgfZht+TNcZd13etZOts8v5 z0ZXfx3R5MjDMboRSpUzDvDpfP4u05obVxE3Kkc2qlxTMpEEi8utjwxjXtlQ/FysXB9d nSiVMLWUcwsyEGbLMnP684tUX/YB9ve0xrXzDt+ZC+xaK25qO3LeqAd8S+Xiu+7ne3eQ LcL4ZdcnP4OJ1S0kDaJE0LegYjCOETbJngq9TqqSCC+AZMMhYvkm9Fu5SFVKi0P0ys3D 1cLA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references; bh=07cgEOod3gwuxaF6KXto8wqlNPfORoTi/49JvPVRHPI=; b=rDv3AuiisUgqoj49i6fL2kr7dHsXRk2RxP8DjAzDFnGIF2LKr3R3pG+kfx2cvMm3q1 JvW7RQcLszoKM97kUCb9nHP+dM8nOJy71HSqNlUpC1MWNMVedPPjG/N+D9L2fQo+ksJW bHAiRyyENEwSJTYcyf2Q7+DufAJ4CCi2hH5ZdUn1d1hnOuMwzDlVNaK01ijadjalEQSo HPXexwBsoZxV0yx/maMVh2CdChhQ0rU3PH6vhfrE0d8vb5zXRx6t7U/ls0uLiJIGgllJ JJ9eTFpwfD5jyQwRwvnWNGJU6jZRmyBjJA8OVUbKOt+g3S7U3/btv3B6IpggXGC0GQnB e02Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXK1r+wXEijQENBqMzdwEwWzqUWSEBVSXKhdORWnpGKzmlpf0i/jFRmMb/brDLPZF890 X-Received: by 10.98.217.209 with SMTP id b78mr42665892pfl.53.1485303678770; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 16:21:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([2620:0:1000:5b10:6936:a216:cb1:3482]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a2sm45451297pfc.72.2017.01.24.16.21.17 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 24 Jan 2017 16:21:17 -0800 (PST) From: Stefan Beller To: cornelius.weig@tngtech.com Cc: j6t@kdbg.org, bitte.keine.werbung.einwerfen@googlemail.com, git@vger.kernel.org, gitster@pobox.com, thomas.braun@virtuell-zuhause.de, john@keeping.me.uk, Stefan Beller Subject: Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 16:21:16 -0800 Message-Id: <20170125002116.22111-1-sbeller@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.11.0.495.g04f60290a0.dirty In-Reply-To: <923cd4e4-5c9c-4eaf-0fea-6deff6875b88@tngtech.com> References: <923cd4e4-5c9c-4eaf-0fea-6deff6875b88@tngtech.com> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org > >> Do not PGP sign your patch, at least *for now*. (...) > And maybe these 2 small words are the bug in the documentation? Shall we drop the "at least for now" part, like so: ---8<--- >From 2c4fe0e67451892186ff6257b20c53e088c9ec67 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stefan Beller Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 16:19:13 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] SubmittingPatches: drop temporal reference for PGP signing Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller --- Documentation/SubmittingPatches | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches index 08352deaae..28da4ad2d4 100644 --- a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches +++ b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches @@ -216,12 +216,12 @@ that it will be postponed. Exception: If your mailer is mangling patches then someone may ask you to re-send them using MIME, that is OK. -Do not PGP sign your patch, at least for now. Most likely, your -maintainer or other people on the list would not have your PGP -key and would not bother obtaining it anyway. Your patch is not -judged by who you are; a good patch from an unknown origin has a -far better chance of being accepted than a patch from a known, -respected origin that is done poorly or does incorrect things. +Do not PGP sign your patch. Most likely, your maintainer or other +people on the list would not have your PGP key and would not bother +obtaining it anyway. Your patch is not judged by who you are; a good +patch from an unknown origin has a far better chance of being accepted +than a patch from a known, respected origin that is done poorly or +does incorrect things. If you really really really really want to do a PGP signed patch, format it as "multipart/signed", not a text/plain message -- 2.11.0.495.g04f60290a0.dirty