From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0211C202C1 for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 22:59:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754290AbdCOW6y (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Mar 2017 18:58:54 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:60774 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754278AbdCOW6v (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Mar 2017 18:58:51 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 849407AE5A; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 18:50:47 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references; s=sasl; bh=q5at KYOej5WigfuoOZlMiU3Bsfw=; b=A5ejdcmyaOjj62yXFqWNHzsFiC19vWy14az5 szVVlLCyoh+LeuMwVK0kegc2YojfpBEfk7r5SimhYKwpypTkC6r5PpVm7QFDfrlt GVDoI2p0NdfTMQbj1xJKnvh1QZH8pubwo9IKhM4rOSRGG9e1PNBcs1RjPtyW51kj jfm0GGc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references; q=dns; s=sasl; b= ZIbonH4MS4qbVaj9bBSQ8IIcNzjzskAkxiaL1RaaQEVcvRm8bqt9fJbwjjE7SGGe 6LhPkg12kTfOK/q8wRCdHtJnpT+W0Flg6gvgSyMIIKx/MaDTxH+BfVwkylK8qspk TlW3CD18jUJaABEupUb6dlHjdoFQ2AzyjLP8oAPI5jQ= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E92E7AE59; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 18:50:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D532B7AE56; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 18:50:46 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: git@vger.kernel.org Cc: Michael J Gruber Subject: [PATCH 0/2] Teach name-rev to pay more attention to lightweight tags Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 15:50:43 -0700 Message-Id: <20170315225045.15788-1-gitster@pobox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.12.0-306-g4a9b9b32d4 In-Reply-To: References: X-Pobox-Relay-ID: D411C766-09D1-11E7-8DC5-FC50AE2156B6-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Here is a reroll of what I did in http://public-inbox.org/git/xmqqd1die00j.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com/ Junio C Hamano (2): name-rev: refactor logic to see if a new candidate is a better name name-rev: favor describing with tags and use committer date to tiebreak builtin/name-rev.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ t/t4202-log.sh | 2 +- 2 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) -- 2.12.0-306-g4a9b9b32d4