From: Santiago Torres <santiago@nyu.edu>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, Jan Palus <jan.palus@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] t7004, t7030: fix here-doc syntax errors
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 17:43:57 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170322214356.5jj7dggtvgilreci@LykOS.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170322211003.b52cql3iwig2xqcd@sigill.intra.peff.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1329 bytes --]
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 05:10:03PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 01:08:05PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> > From: Jan Palus <jan.palus@gmail.com>
> >
> > These all came as part of an earlier st/verify-tag topic that was
> > merged to 2.12.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
> > ---
> >
> > * This should be applied on top of 4fea72f4 ("t/t7004-tag: Add
> > --format specifier tests", 2017-01-17)
> >
> > t/t7004-tag.sh | 8 ++++----
> > t/t7030-verify-tag.sh | 8 ++++----
> > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
On my side, these patches make tests fail. I'm wondering if this is an
issue with the underlying shell (probably the version)? Let me try to
figure out what is exactly going on here.
> Like 2/3, this one also produces test failures for me. It looks like
> "verify-tag" does not show a tag which has been forged. I'm not sure if
> that's intentional (and the test is wrong) or a bug.
I see that offending code would be [1]. Changing this behavior should be
trivial (dropping the continue), although I'm not sure if this is what
we want?
>
> -Peff
Thanks,
-Santiago.
[1] https://github.com/git/git/blob/master/builtin/verify-tag.c#L6://github.com/git/git/blob/master/builtin/verify-tag.c#L67
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-22 21:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-22 17:35 EOF test fixes (t5615/t7004) Jan Palus
2017-03-22 18:28 ` EOF test fixes (t7030/t7406) Jan Palus
2017-03-22 18:47 ` EOF test fixes (t5615/t7004) Stefan Beller
2017-03-22 19:43 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-22 20:08 ` [PATCH 0/3] fix "here-doc" syntax errors Junio C Hamano
2017-03-22 20:08 ` [PATCH 1/3] t5615: fix a here-doc syntax error Junio C Hamano
2017-03-22 21:02 ` Jeff King
2017-03-22 20:08 ` [PATCH 2/3] t7406: fix here-doc syntax errors Junio C Hamano
2017-03-22 21:07 ` Jeff King
2017-03-22 21:32 ` Stefan Beller
2017-03-22 21:39 ` Jeff King
2017-03-22 21:49 ` [PATCH] t7406: correct test case for submodule-update initial population Stefan Beller
2017-03-22 21:59 ` Jeff King
2017-03-22 22:07 ` Stefan Beller
2017-03-22 22:09 ` Jeff King
2017-03-22 22:14 ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-03-22 22:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-22 22:24 ` Jeff King
2017-03-22 22:28 ` Stefan Beller
2017-03-22 21:34 ` [PATCH 2/3] t7406: fix here-doc syntax errors Junio C Hamano
2017-03-22 20:08 ` [PATCH 3/3] t7004, t7030: " Junio C Hamano
2017-03-22 21:10 ` Jeff King
2017-03-22 21:43 ` Santiago Torres [this message]
2017-03-22 22:04 ` Jeff King
2017-03-22 22:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-22 22:15 ` Santiago Torres
2017-03-22 22:22 ` Jeff King
2017-03-22 22:34 ` Santiago Torres
2017-03-22 22:41 ` Jeff King
2017-03-22 22:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-22 22:51 ` Santiago Torres
2017-03-23 22:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-23 22:28 ` Santiago Torres
2017-03-23 23:49 ` Jeff King
2017-03-24 16:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-24 16:49 ` Jeff King
2017-03-24 18:00 ` Jeff King
2017-03-24 18:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-24 18:16 ` Jeff King
2017-03-22 22:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-22 22:40 ` [PATCH 0/3] fix "here-doc" " Jan Palus
2017-03-23 2:12 ` [PATCH] tests: lint for run-away here-doc Junio C Hamano
2017-03-23 5:43 ` [PATCH v2] " Junio C Hamano
2017-03-24 1:29 ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-03-24 2:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-24 3:59 ` Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170322214356.5jj7dggtvgilreci@LykOS.localdomain \
--to=santiago@nyu.edu \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jan.palus@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox