From: Eric Wong <e@80x24.org>
To: Craig McQueen <craig.mcqueen@innerrange.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: git svn and SVN property svn:original-date
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 17:31:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170323173156.GA29732@starla> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5500469A22567C4BAF673A6E86AFA3A40295E65B4365@IR-CENTRAL.corp.innerrange.com>
Craig McQueen <craig.mcqueen@innerrange.com> wrote:
> Eric Wong wrote:
> > Craig McQueen <craig.mcqueen@innerrange.com> wrote:
> > > Apparently SVN revisions can have an "svn:original-date" property, which
> > would be good to set on dcommit, to preserve the timestamp from the git
> > repository.
> > >
> > >
> > https://subversion.apache.org/docs/api/1.7/group__svn__props__revision
> > > __props.html#ga8f17351dd056149da9cb490f1daf4018
> >
> > Any idea if which versions of SVN it's supported in and how recent the
> > feature is?
>
> I see discussion about it in 2003, so I guess it's been there right from 1.0.0.
>
> > Perhaps we can enable it everywhere, and maybe only old clients won't
> > understand it, but won't fail; and we could start using it as the author date
> > with "git svn fetch".
>
> Using it for author date sounds sensible.
OK, I'd be inclined to accept a patch + tests for that;
my plate might be full with non-git stuff until April.
> > OTOH, that would break the (perhaps unofficial) independently-created-git-
> > svn-mirrors-should-have-same-oids-by-default
> > rule when people run different versions of git, so maybe it could be an
> > option...
>
> Hmm, good question. Maybe it should be an option, though I
> hope it would be enabled by default (since the feature would
> be more metadata-preserving, which is a good thing), with an
> option to disable it to allow backwards compatibility with
> people running an older version of git. That's my opinion
> anyway, and I realise my opinion is not necessarily
> well-informed regarding all considerations.
Given git-svn behavior hasn't changed much in over a decade, I'd
rather be conservative with regards to changing any existing
behavior. We could offer one warning about it to inform users
about it if original-date is seen, however.
> Note, I'm unclear as to whether Subversion is willing to store
> timezone information in svn:original-date. But I guess having
> git author date correspond to svn:original-date is an
> improvement for preserving more metadata, even if the timezone
> is lost in the process.
Can you find any examples of it in the wild? I prefer having
real-world examples to look at. Thanks.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-23 17:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-22 23:26 git svn and SVN property svn:original-date Craig McQueen
2017-03-23 2:56 ` Eric Wong
2017-03-23 4:18 ` Craig McQueen
2017-03-23 17:31 ` Eric Wong [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170323173156.GA29732@starla \
--to=e@80x24.org \
--cc=craig.mcqueen@innerrange.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).