From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8786620357 for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 10:48:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755274AbdGKKsA (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jul 2017 06:48:00 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([104.130.231.41]:36866 "HELO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1754550AbdGKKr6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jul 2017 06:47:58 -0400 Received: (qmail 3390 invoked by uid 109); 11 Jul 2017 10:47:57 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with SMTP; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 10:47:57 +0000 Authentication-Results: cloud.peff.net; auth=none Received: (qmail 15265 invoked by uid 111); 11 Jul 2017 10:48:10 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with SMTP; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 06:48:10 -0400 Authentication-Results: peff.net; auth=none Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 11 Jul 2017 06:47:56 -0400 Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 06:47:56 -0400 From: Jeff King To: Junio C Hamano Cc: Martin =?utf-8?B?w4VncmVu?= , git@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Nieder , =?utf-8?B?Tmd1eeG7hW4gVGjDoWkgTmfhu41j?= Duy , Brandon Williams Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] tag: more fine-grained pager-configuration Message-ID: <20170711104755.4z5exp43lvwbb5hq@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 03:42:14PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > A review would be much appreciated. Comments on the way I > > structured the series would be just as welcome as ones on the > > final result. > > I see you CC'ed Peff who's passionate in this area, so these patches > are in good hands already ;-) I briefly skimmed your patches myself, > and did not spot anything glaringly wrong. Heh, I don't think of "paging tag output" as one of my passions, but you may be right. :) I left a few comments on the code and direction, but I agree that overall it looks pretty good. And I'm very impressed with the attention to detail for a first-time contributor. -Peff