From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4866E2036B for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2017 19:30:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751868AbdJGT3F (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Oct 2017 15:29:05 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([104.130.231.41]:36382 "HELO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751421AbdJGT3F (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Oct 2017 15:29:05 -0400 Received: (qmail 14885 invoked by uid 109); 7 Oct 2017 19:29:05 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with SMTP; Sat, 07 Oct 2017 19:29:05 +0000 Authentication-Results: cloud.peff.net; auth=none Received: (qmail 3628 invoked by uid 111); 7 Oct 2017 19:29:05 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with SMTP; Sat, 07 Oct 2017 15:29:05 -0400 Authentication-Results: peff.net; auth=none Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 07 Oct 2017 15:29:02 -0400 Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2017 15:29:02 -0400 From: Jeff King To: "Robert P. J. Day" Cc: Todd Zullinger , Git Mailing list Subject: Re: "git rm" seems to do recursive removal even without "-r" Message-ID: <20171007192902.ma4s47hn6edwldx5@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <20171007190402.GH3382@zaya.teonanacatl.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Oct 07, 2017 at 03:12:01PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > ok, in that case, can you give me an example where "-r" makes a > difference, given that the man page refers to "a leading directory > name being given"? let's use as an example the linux kernel source, > where there are a *ton* of files named "Makefile" under the drivers/ > directory. > > should there be a difference between: > > $ git rm drivers/Makefile > $ git rm -r drivers/Makefile > > clearly, i have a "leading directory name" in both examples above ... > what should happen differently? Nothing, because there is nothing to recurse in the pathspecs you've given. Try: $ git rm drivers fatal: not removing 'drivers' recursively without -r versus $ git rm -r drivers [...removes everything under drivers/...] -Peff