From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Cc: Constantine <hi-angel@yandex.ru>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>,
Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>, git <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: git-clone causes out of memory
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 10:20:05 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171013142004.ocxpdkkbcxpi52yv@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171013141018.62zvezivkkhloc5d@sigill.intra.peff.net>
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 10:10:18AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> Hmm. So this patch makes it go fast:
>
> diff --git a/revision.c b/revision.c
> index d167223e69..b52ea4e9d8 100644
> --- a/revision.c
> +++ b/revision.c
> @@ -409,7 +409,7 @@ static void file_add_remove(struct diff_options *options,
> int diff = addremove == '+' ? REV_TREE_NEW : REV_TREE_OLD;
>
> tree_difference |= diff;
> - if (tree_difference == REV_TREE_DIFFERENT)
> + if (tree_difference & REV_TREE_DIFFERENT)
> DIFF_OPT_SET(options, HAS_CHANGES);
> }
>
>
> But that essentially makes the conditional a noop (since we know we set
> either NEW or OLD above and DIFFERENT is the union of those flags).
>
> I'm not sure I understand why file_add_remove() would ever want to avoid
> setting HAS_CHANGES (certainly its companion file_change() always does).
> This goes back to Junio's dd47aa3133 (try-to-simplify-commit: use
> diff-tree --quiet machinery., 2007-03-14).
>
> Maybe I am missing something, but AFAICT this was always buggy. But
> since it only affects adds and deletes, maybe nobody noticed? I'm also
> not sure if it only causes a slowdown, or if this could cause us to
> erroneously mark something as TREESAME which isn't (I _do_ think people
> would have noticed that).
Answering my own question a little, there is a hint in the comment
a few lines above:
/*
* The goal is to get REV_TREE_NEW as the result only if the
* diff consists of all '+' (and no other changes), REV_TREE_OLD
* if the whole diff is removal of old data, and otherwise
* REV_TREE_DIFFERENT (of course if the trees are the same we
* want REV_TREE_SAME).
* That means that once we get to REV_TREE_DIFFERENT, we do not
* have to look any further.
*/
So my patch above is breaking that. But it's not clear from that comment
why we care about knowing the different between NEW, OLD, and DIFFERENT.
Grepping around for REV_TREE_NEW and REV_TREE_OLD, I think the answer is
in try_to_simplify_commit():
case REV_TREE_NEW:
if (revs->remove_empty_trees &&
rev_same_tree_as_empty(revs, p)) {
/* We are adding all the specified
* paths from this parent, so the
* history beyond this parent is not
* interesting. Remove its parents
* (they are grandparents for us).
* IOW, we pretend this parent is a
* "root" commit.
*/
if (parse_commit(p) < 0)
die("cannot simplify commit %s (invalid %s)",
oid_to_hex(&commit->object.oid),
oid_to_hex(&p->object.oid));
p->parents = NULL;
}
/* fallthrough */
case REV_TREE_OLD:
case REV_TREE_DIFFERENT:
So when --remove-empty is not in effect (and it's not by default), we
don't care about OLD vs NEW, and we should be able to optimize further.
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-13 14:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-13 9:51 git-clone causes out of memory Constantine
2017-10-13 10:06 ` Mike Hommey
2017-10-13 10:26 ` Christian Couder
2017-10-13 10:37 ` Mike Hommey
2017-10-13 10:44 ` Christian Couder
2017-10-13 12:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-10-13 12:12 ` Constantine
2017-10-13 12:44 ` Jeff King
2017-10-13 13:15 ` Derrick Stolee
2017-10-13 13:39 ` Derrick Stolee
2017-10-13 13:50 ` Jeff King
2017-10-13 13:55 ` Derrick Stolee
2017-10-13 13:56 ` Jeff King
2017-10-13 14:10 ` Jeff King
2017-10-13 14:20 ` Jeff King [this message]
2017-10-13 14:25 ` Derrick Stolee
2017-10-13 14:26 ` Jeff King
2017-10-13 14:30 ` Derrick Stolee
2017-10-13 15:27 ` [PATCH] revision: quit pruning diff more quickly when possible Jeff King
2017-10-13 15:37 ` Derrick Stolee
2017-10-13 15:44 ` Jeff King
2017-10-14 2:43 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-10-13 12:35 ` git-clone causes out of memory Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171013142004.ocxpdkkbcxpi52yv@sigill.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=christian.couder@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=hi-angel@yandex.ru \
--cc=mh@glandium.org \
--cc=stolee@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).