From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>,
Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>,
Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] p5550: factor our nonsense-pack creation
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 00:02:15 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171123050214.GB22218@sigill> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqlgixra22.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 11:41:25AM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
>
> > Right, I came to the same conclusion (we may even have discussed this on
> > the list, I don't remember). The current "todo" format says that only
> > the command and sha1 matter, and we'd be changing that. Maybe that's not
> > so bad if the user has to enable the feature themselves (and clearly it
> > would be incompatible with a custom format option).
>
> If you are in the habit of always writing 4 or more lines, the
> chance that you would make a typo on the line you can correct in the
> "todo" list with such a feature is at most 25% ;-).
You'd think, but the distribution of typos doesn't seem to be uniform.
:)
I think what actually happens is that I quite often do my final
proofread in my MUA, where the subject is displayed apart from the rest
of the message. So I tend to gloss over it, and any errors there are
more likely to make it to the list.
> I think one downside is that a mere presence of such an option hints
> that we somehow encourage people to commit with a title-only message.
Yeah, though it might be handy for me I think it just opens up too many
funny questions like this.
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-23 5:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-20 20:26 [PATCH 0/5] avoiding pointless pack-directory re-scans Jeff King
2017-11-20 20:26 ` [PATCH 1/5] p5550: factor our nonsense-pack creation Jeff King
2017-11-20 23:55 ` Eric Sunshine
2017-11-21 15:58 ` Jeff King
2017-11-22 0:32 ` Stefan Beller
2017-11-22 22:38 ` Jeff King
2017-11-23 2:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-11-23 5:02 ` Jeff King [this message]
2017-11-20 20:27 ` [PATCH 2/5] t/perf/lib-pack: use fast-import checkpoint to create packs Jeff King
2017-11-20 20:28 ` [PATCH 3/5] p5551: add a script to test fetch pack-dir rescans Jeff King
2017-11-20 20:29 ` [PATCH 4/5] everything_local: use "quick" object existence check Jeff King
2017-11-20 20:35 ` [PATCH 5/5] sha1_file: don't re-scan pack directory for null sha1 Jeff King
2017-11-20 20:47 ` Stefan Beller
2017-11-20 20:58 ` Jeff King
2017-11-21 2:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-11-21 22:57 ` Jeff King
2017-11-22 1:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-11-22 22:36 ` Jeff King
2017-11-23 2:35 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-11-24 17:32 ` Jeff King
2017-11-25 3:20 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-11-21 5:20 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-11-21 23:17 ` Jeff King
2017-11-22 1:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-11-22 3:17 ` Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171123050214.GB22218@sigill \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=sbeller@google.com \
--cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).