From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Jeff Hostetler <git@jeffhostetler.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, gitster@pobox.com,
Jeff Hostetler <jeffhost@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] status: support --no-ahead-behind in long status format.
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 11:33:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171220163301.GD31149@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171220144245.39401-5-git@jeffhostetler.com>
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 02:42:45PM +0000, Jeff Hostetler wrote:
> diff --git a/Documentation/git-status.txt b/Documentation/git-status.txt
> index ea029ad..9a2f209 100644
> --- a/Documentation/git-status.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/git-status.txt
> @@ -120,6 +120,9 @@ configuration variable documented in linkgit:git-config[1].
> +
> In short format with --branch, '[different]' will printed rather
> than detailed ahead/behind counts.
> ++
> + In long (normal) format, a simple out of date message will be
> + printed rather than detailed ahead/behind counts.
Same asciidoc trickery here as in the first patch (and in the --short
one, too, but I forgot to mention it).
> + } else if (no_ahead_behind) {
> + strbuf_addf(sb, _("Your branch is out of date with '%s'.\n"),
> + base);
> +
> + /* TODO Do we need a generic hint here? */
> +
I'm not sure what we'd advise here. I'd consider:
git log --oneline --graph HEAD..@{upstream}
to see the actual differences, but that's a bit verbose. Is there an
easy way to re-enable it? I guess repeating the command with
"--ahead-behind" should do so.
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-20 16:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-20 14:42 [PATCH 0/4] Add --no-ahead-behind to status Jeff Hostetler
2017-12-20 14:42 ` [PATCH 1/4] status: add --no-ahead-behind to porcelain V2 Jeff Hostetler
2017-12-20 16:07 ` Jeff King
2017-12-20 16:33 ` Jeff King
2017-12-20 19:44 ` Jeff Hostetler
2017-12-20 14:42 ` [PATCH 2/4] stat_tracking_info: return +1 when branch and upstream differ Jeff Hostetler
2017-12-20 16:14 ` Jeff King
2017-12-20 16:37 ` Jeff King
2017-12-21 14:06 ` Jeff Hostetler
2017-12-20 14:42 ` [PATCH 3/4] status: update short status to use --no-ahead-behind Jeff Hostetler
2017-12-20 16:26 ` Jeff King
2017-12-21 14:18 ` Jeff Hostetler
2017-12-21 15:39 ` Jeff King
2017-12-21 17:47 ` Jeff Hostetler
2017-12-20 14:42 ` [PATCH 4/4] status: support --no-ahead-behind in long status format Jeff Hostetler
2017-12-20 16:33 ` Jeff King [this message]
2017-12-20 16:43 ` [PATCH 0/4] Add --no-ahead-behind to status Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171220163301.GD31149@sigill.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=git@jeffhostetler.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jeffhost@microsoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).