From: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 01/34] Tighten and correct a few testcases for merging and cherry-picking
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2017 20:13:19 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171228041352.27880-2-newren@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171228041352.27880-1-newren@gmail.com>
t3501 had a testcase originally added in 05f2dfb965 (cherry-pick:
demonstrate a segmentation fault, 2016-11-26) to ensure cherry-pick
wouldn't segfault when working with a dirty file involved in a rename.
While the segfault was fixed, there was another problem this test
demonstrated: namely, that git would overwrite a dirty file involved in a
rename. Further, the test encoded a "successful merge" and overwriting of
this file as correct behavior. Modify the test so that it would still
catch the segfault, but to require the correct behavior. Mark it as
test_expect_failure for now too, since this second bug is not yet fixed.
t7607 had a test added in 30fd3a5425 (merge overwrites unstaged changes in
renamed file, 2012-04-15) specific to looking for a merge overwriting a
dirty file involved in a rename, but it too actually encoded what I would
term incorrect behavior: it expected the merge to succeed. Fix that, and
add a few more checks to make sure that the merge really does produce the
expected results.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
---
t/t3501-revert-cherry-pick.sh | 7 +++++--
t/t7607-merge-overwrite.sh | 5 ++++-
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/t/t3501-revert-cherry-pick.sh b/t/t3501-revert-cherry-pick.sh
index 4f2a263b6..783bdbf59 100755
--- a/t/t3501-revert-cherry-pick.sh
+++ b/t/t3501-revert-cherry-pick.sh
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ test_expect_success 'cherry-pick "-" works with arguments' '
test_cmp expect actual
'
-test_expect_success 'cherry-pick works with dirty renamed file' '
+test_expect_failure 'cherry-pick works with dirty renamed file' '
test_commit to-rename &&
git checkout -b unrelated &&
test_commit unrelated &&
@@ -150,7 +150,10 @@ test_expect_success 'cherry-pick works with dirty renamed file' '
test_tick &&
git commit -m renamed &&
echo modified >renamed &&
- git cherry-pick refs/heads/unrelated
+ test_must_fail git cherry-pick refs/heads/unrelated >out &&
+ test_i18ngrep "Refusing to lose dirty file at renamed" out &&
+ test $(git rev-parse :0:renamed) = $(git rev-parse HEAD^:to-rename.t) &&
+ grep -q "^modified$" renamed
'
test_done
diff --git a/t/t7607-merge-overwrite.sh b/t/t7607-merge-overwrite.sh
index 9444d6a9b..00617dadf 100755
--- a/t/t7607-merge-overwrite.sh
+++ b/t/t7607-merge-overwrite.sh
@@ -97,7 +97,10 @@ test_expect_failure 'will not overwrite unstaged changes in renamed file' '
git mv c1.c other.c &&
git commit -m rename &&
cp important other.c &&
- git merge c1a &&
+ test_must_fail git merge c1a >out &&
+ test_i18ngrep "Refusing to lose dirty file at other.c" out &&
+ test -f other.c~HEAD &&
+ test $(git hash-object other.c~HEAD) = $(git rev-parse c1a:c1.c) &&
test_cmp important other.c
'
--
2.15.0.408.g8e199d483
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-28 4:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-28 4:13 [PATCH v5 00/34] Add directory rename detection to git Elijah Newren
2017-12-28 4:13 ` Elijah Newren [this message]
2017-12-28 4:13 ` [PATCH v5 02/34] merge-recursive: fix logic ordering issue Elijah Newren
2017-12-28 4:13 ` [PATCH v5 03/34] merge-recursive: add explanation for src_entry and dst_entry Elijah Newren
2017-12-28 4:13 ` [PATCH v5 04/34] directory rename detection: basic testcases Elijah Newren
2018-01-03 1:18 ` SZEDER Gábor
2018-01-03 3:43 ` Elijah Newren
2017-12-28 4:13 ` [PATCH v5 05/34] directory rename detection: directory splitting testcases Elijah Newren
2017-12-28 4:13 ` [PATCH v5 06/34] directory rename detection: testcases to avoid taking detection too far Elijah Newren
2017-12-28 4:13 ` [PATCH v5 07/34] directory rename detection: partially renamed directory testcase/discussion Elijah Newren
2017-12-28 4:13 ` [PATCH v5 08/34] directory rename detection: files/directories in the way of some renames Elijah Newren
2017-12-28 4:13 ` [PATCH v5 09/34] directory rename detection: testcases checking which side did the rename Elijah Newren
2017-12-28 4:13 ` [PATCH v5 10/34] directory rename detection: more involved edge/corner testcases Elijah Newren
2017-12-28 4:13 ` [PATCH v5 11/34] directory rename detection: testcases exploring possibly suboptimal merges Elijah Newren
2017-12-28 4:13 ` [PATCH v5 12/34] directory rename detection: miscellaneous testcases to complete coverage Elijah Newren
2017-12-28 4:13 ` [PATCH v5 13/34] directory rename detection: tests for handling overwriting untracked files Elijah Newren
2018-01-04 0:52 ` SZEDER Gábor
2018-01-04 21:10 ` Elijah Newren
2018-01-05 14:37 ` SZEDER Gábor
2018-01-05 20:31 ` Thomas Gummerer
2018-01-05 20:33 ` Elijah Newren
2017-12-28 4:13 ` [PATCH v5 14/34] directory rename detection: tests for handling overwriting dirty files Elijah Newren
2017-12-28 4:13 ` [PATCH v5 15/34] merge-recursive: move the get_renames() function Elijah Newren
2017-12-28 4:13 ` [PATCH v5 16/34] merge-recursive: introduce new functions to handle rename logic Elijah Newren
2017-12-28 4:13 ` [PATCH v5 17/34] merge-recursive: fix leaks of allocated renames and diff_filepairs Elijah Newren
2017-12-28 4:13 ` [PATCH v5 18/34] merge-recursive: make !o->detect_rename codepath more obvious Elijah Newren
2017-12-28 4:13 ` [PATCH v5 19/34] merge-recursive: split out code for determining diff_filepairs Elijah Newren
2017-12-28 4:13 ` [PATCH v5 20/34] merge-recursive: add a new hashmap for storing directory renames Elijah Newren
2017-12-28 4:13 ` [PATCH v5 21/34] merge-recursive: make a helper function for cleanup for handle_renames Elijah Newren
2017-12-28 4:13 ` [PATCH v5 22/34] merge-recursive: add get_directory_renames() Elijah Newren
2017-12-28 4:13 ` [PATCH v5 23/34] merge-recursive: check for directory level conflicts Elijah Newren
2017-12-28 4:13 ` [PATCH v5 24/34] merge-recursive: add a new hashmap for storing file collisions Elijah Newren
2017-12-28 4:13 ` [PATCH v5 25/34] merge-recursive: add computation of collisions due to dir rename & merging Elijah Newren
2017-12-28 4:13 ` [PATCH v5 26/34] merge-recursive: check for file level conflicts then get new name Elijah Newren
2017-12-28 4:13 ` [PATCH v5 27/34] merge-recursive: when comparing files, don't include trees Elijah Newren
2017-12-28 4:13 ` [PATCH v5 28/34] merge-recursive: apply necessary modifications for directory renames Elijah Newren
2017-12-28 4:13 ` [PATCH v5 29/34] merge-recursive: avoid clobbering untracked files with " Elijah Newren
2017-12-28 4:13 ` [PATCH v5 30/34] merge-recursive: fix overwriting dirty files involved in renames Elijah Newren
2017-12-28 4:13 ` [PATCH v5 31/34] merge-recursive: fix remaining directory rename + dirty overwrite cases Elijah Newren
2017-12-28 4:13 ` [PATCH v5 32/34] directory rename detection: new testcases showcasing a pair of bugs Elijah Newren
2017-12-28 4:13 ` [PATCH v5 33/34] merge-recursive: avoid spurious rename/rename conflict from dir renames Elijah Newren
2017-12-28 4:13 ` [PATCH v5 34/34] merge-recursive: ensure we write updates for directory-renamed file Elijah Newren
2018-01-03 0:02 ` [PATCH v5 00/34] Add directory rename detection to git Elijah Newren
2018-01-03 10:57 ` Johannes Sixt
2018-01-03 21:02 ` Elijah Newren
2018-01-03 22:23 ` Johannes Sixt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171228041352.27880-2-newren@gmail.com \
--to=newren@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).