From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA5351F404 for ; Thu, 28 Dec 2017 04:14:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753356AbdL1EOh (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Dec 2017 23:14:37 -0500 Received: from mail-it0-f67.google.com ([209.85.214.67]:45451 "EHLO mail-it0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752849AbdL1EOe (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Dec 2017 23:14:34 -0500 Received: by mail-it0-f67.google.com with SMTP id z6so26969978iti.4 for ; Wed, 27 Dec 2017 20:14:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references; bh=2Gp1MA4/i/MOaTZCCWdzfCr0/JjuPnECnMLkS9W6my8=; b=PFLQwWZv4l1BRIJq0TNbGtvG9LW1zYqRqSKPddRHrDTpXadhZPr9d8RCGST182Ke8b QQLIc1jM3Bw3GONrGXjld9gDXoQ5E88d91xmpW+lRx+VUw+U1nHMX0kk6HgG58BbDdVT aDUvopXUGCvlcNdjxNTl2mL4HXcqBYkBSvxLXoFmlw1h+g3SWeoVAXWi06RrjoG8ixJU ci2OfguLFBPRiIUMtK0d7Kmy+6weggkGeUR7WE7BlraP7Bgd9+CdjTtnoplVGkTXFIM5 qolWb9vrXRkPSwiN71jSdyn/JwUepVaH41mU5Io16aIS2NaaPWR0VOWB4dxuYZNqYyoj aNhw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references; bh=2Gp1MA4/i/MOaTZCCWdzfCr0/JjuPnECnMLkS9W6my8=; b=Pwa/0Gr1zRZPjf+/5lF8WVYLGtkNqWkRLX1bp6b5l2MJO+CEypzHQOT83Q2IKuhrZR fpzFK2Y99iCe+crribT6Za1HaUzQZ0QGZ0sswm5l5ImKQ5vTmomDfXEZBtvgXHjkeMNc +/gYkjA2vZvynAwRBdIvD4Rtuyr1GFfOYe8AkLe5EgOwqUJ89BVnJoY4ZZVRK4eTFEMO /zHcaezMeBq6fMXNkQMMPoiLgYJo1LhoWPKhPr+5DfQqUDe6+6JPQPd3WOkFhlz9FZf7 lPv1pR66n5HBjlfY/mqVq+MCKHJKcD8qx7cEPVFMspXkEIdDRBvjxyvplRuP1VBQDN84 VujQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mL1asSgA6RPRqE/ePdd5LmapOdY5URriJPWco/IAXPlveMPA32f S6LkmxLJQIhAg3zFtZ+dpwBRwA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBosFQEM0FEi++/mizZxlNxvm/aUPql4JZQAlr7lPluZX9LDqYrLPeavuMQUjAFPwWekY9zXkGg== X-Received: by 10.36.125.129 with SMTP id b123mr40542653itc.142.1514434473757; Wed, 27 Dec 2017 20:14:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (170-72-6-219.ut.vivintwireless.net. [170.72.6.219]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f207sm11201841ita.26.2017.12.27.20.14.32 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 27 Dec 2017 20:14:32 -0800 (PST) From: Elijah Newren To: git@vger.kernel.org Cc: Elijah Newren Subject: [PATCH v5 31/34] merge-recursive: fix remaining directory rename + dirty overwrite cases Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2017 20:13:49 -0800 Message-Id: <20171228041352.27880-32-newren@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.15.0.408.g8e199d483 In-Reply-To: <20171228041352.27880-1-newren@gmail.com> References: <20171228041352.27880-1-newren@gmail.com> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren --- merge-recursive.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++--- t/t6043-merge-rename-directories.sh | 8 ++++---- 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/merge-recursive.c b/merge-recursive.c index 2b8a5ca03..fe42cabad 100644 --- a/merge-recursive.c +++ b/merge-recursive.c @@ -1311,11 +1311,23 @@ static int handle_file(struct merge_options *o, add = filespec_from_entry(&other, dst_entry, stage ^ 1); if (add) { + int ren_src_was_dirty = was_dirty(o, rename->path); char *add_name = unique_path(o, rename->path, other_branch); if (update_file(o, 0, &add->oid, add->mode, add_name)) return -1; - remove_file(o, 0, rename->path, 0); + if (ren_src_was_dirty) { + output(o, 1, _("Refusing to lose dirty file at %s"), + rename->path); + } + /* + * Stupid double negatives in remove_file; it somehow manages + * to repeatedly mess me up. So, just for myself: + * 1) update_wd iff !ren_src_was_dirty. + * 2) no_wd iff !update_wd + * 3) so, no_wd == !!ren_src_was_dirty == ren_src_was_dirty + */ + remove_file(o, 0, rename->path, ren_src_was_dirty); dst_name = unique_path(o, rename->path, cur_branch); } else { if (dir_in_way(rename->path, !o->call_depth, 0)) { @@ -1453,7 +1465,10 @@ static int conflict_rename_rename_2to1(struct merge_options *o, char *new_path2 = unique_path(o, path, ci->branch2); output(o, 1, _("Renaming %s to %s and %s to %s instead"), a->path, new_path1, b->path, new_path2); - if (would_lose_untracked(path)) + if (was_dirty(o, path)) + output(o, 1, _("Refusing to lose dirty file at %s"), + path); + else if (would_lose_untracked(path)) /* * Only way we get here is if both renames were from * a directory rename AND user had an untracked file @@ -2033,6 +2048,7 @@ static void apply_directory_rename_modifications(struct merge_options *o, { struct string_list_item *item; int stage = (tree == a_tree ? 2 : 3); + int update_wd; /* * In all cases where we can do directory rename detection, @@ -2043,7 +2059,11 @@ static void apply_directory_rename_modifications(struct merge_options *o, * saying the file would have been overwritten), but it might * be dirty, though. */ - remove_file(o, 1, pair->two->path, 0 /* no_wd */); + update_wd = !was_dirty(o, pair->two->path); + if (!update_wd) + output(o, 1, _("Refusing to lose dirty file at %s"), + pair->two->path); + remove_file(o, 1, pair->two->path, !update_wd); /* Find or create a new re->dst_entry */ item = string_list_lookup(entries, new_path); diff --git a/t/t6043-merge-rename-directories.sh b/t/t6043-merge-rename-directories.sh index 86c215e13..556029ef5 100755 --- a/t/t6043-merge-rename-directories.sh +++ b/t/t6043-merge-rename-directories.sh @@ -3224,7 +3224,7 @@ test_expect_success '11b-setup: Avoid losing dirty file involved in directory re ) ' -test_expect_failure '11b-check: Avoid losing dirty file involved in directory rename' ' +test_expect_success '11b-check: Avoid losing dirty file involved in directory rename' ' ( cd 11b && @@ -3358,7 +3358,7 @@ test_expect_success '11d-setup: Avoid losing not-uptodate with rename + D/F conf ) ' -test_expect_failure '11d-check: Avoid losing not-uptodate with rename + D/F conflict' ' +test_expect_success '11d-check: Avoid losing not-uptodate with rename + D/F conflict' ' ( cd 11d && @@ -3432,7 +3432,7 @@ test_expect_success '11e-setup: Avoid deleting not-uptodate with dir rename/rena ) ' -test_expect_failure '11e-check: Avoid deleting not-uptodate with dir rename/rename(1to2)/add' ' +test_expect_success '11e-check: Avoid deleting not-uptodate with dir rename/rename(1to2)/add' ' ( cd 11e && @@ -3506,7 +3506,7 @@ test_expect_success '11f-setup: Avoid deleting not-uptodate with dir rename/rena ) ' -test_expect_failure '11f-check: Avoid deleting not-uptodate with dir rename/rename(2to1)' ' +test_expect_success '11f-check: Avoid deleting not-uptodate with dir rename/rename(2to1)' ' ( cd 11f && -- 2.15.0.408.g8e199d483