From: Brandon Williams <bmwill@google.com>
To: Dorian Taylor <dorian.taylor.lists@gmail.com>
Cc: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>, Jeff King <peff@peff.net>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: bug in HTTP protocol spec
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 09:52:19 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180222175219.GA185096@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <614A9A36-9DE3-4A85-BFA8-8380C4AC21B8@gmail.com>
On 02/21, Dorian Taylor wrote:
>
> > On Feb 21, 2018, at 9:37 PM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for writing it.
> >
> > Do you mind if we forge your sign-off? (See Documentation/SubmittingPatches
> > item '(5) Certify your work' for details about what this means.)
>
> Sure, or I can just re-paste:
>
> Signed-off-by: Dorian Taylor <dorian.taylor.lists@gmail.com>
>
> ---
> Documentation/technical/http-protocol.txt | 10 +++++++---
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/technical/http-protocol.txt b/Documentation/technical/http-protocol.txt
> index a0e45f2889e6e..19d73f7efb338 100644
> --- a/Documentation/technical/http-protocol.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/technical/http-protocol.txt
> @@ -214,14 +214,17 @@ smart server reply:
> S: Cache-Control: no-cache
> S:
> S: 001e# service=git-upload-pack\n
> + S: 0000
> S: 004895dcfa3633004da0049d3d0fa03f80589cbcaf31 refs/heads/maint\0multi_ack\n
> S: 0042d049f6c27a2244e12041955e262a404c7faba355 refs/heads/master\n
> S: 003c2cb58b79488a98d2721cea644875a8dd0026b115 refs/tags/v1.0\n
> S: 003fa3c2e2402b99163d1d59756e5f207ae21cccba4c refs/tags/v1.0^{}\n
> + S: 0000
>
> The client may send Extra Parameters (see
> Documentation/technical/pack-protocol.txt) as a colon-separated string
> -in the Git-Protocol HTTP header.
> +in the Git-Protocol HTTP header. Note as well that there is *no* newline
> +after the `0000`.
>
> Dumb Server Response
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> @@ -264,8 +267,8 @@ Servers MUST set $servicename to be the request parameter value.
> Servers SHOULD include an LF at the end of this line.
> Clients MUST ignore an LF at the end of the line.
>
> -Servers MUST terminate the response with the magic `0000` end
> -pkt-line marker.
> +Servers MUST follow the first pkt-line, as well as terminate the
> +response, with the magic `0000` end pkt-line marker.
>
> The returned response is a pkt-line stream describing each ref and
> its known value. The stream SHOULD be sorted by name according to
> @@ -278,6 +281,7 @@ Extra Parameter.
>
> smart_reply = PKT-LINE("# service=$servicename" LF)
> *1("version 1")
> + "0000"
> ref_list
> "0000"
> ref_list = empty_list / non_empty_list
>
> ---
>
> >
> >> Note I am not sure what the story is behind that `version 1`
> >> element, whether it's supposed to go before or after the null packet
> >> or if there should be another null packet or what. Perhaps somebody
> >> more fluent with the smart protocol can advise.
> >
> > I believe the 'version 1' goes after the flush-packet.
>
> I took a traipse through the code and couldn’t determine it one way or another, but my money is on that looking something like `000aversion 1\n` on the wire.
Yes the version string goes along with the ref_list in v1 like so:
# service=<service>
0000
version 1
ref_list
0000
This is because it is part of the payload which is actually delivered to
the git fetch/push binary where as the "# service" bit is used by the
remote helper to identify smart vs not smart servers.
>
> --
> Dorian Taylor
> Make things. Make sense.
> https://doriantaylor.com
>
--
Brandon Williams
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-22 17:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-21 18:29 bug in HTTP protocol spec Dorian Taylor
2018-02-21 22:15 ` Jeff King
2018-02-21 23:50 ` Dorian Taylor
2018-02-22 5:37 ` Jonathan Nieder
2018-02-22 7:23 ` Dorian Taylor
2018-02-22 10:08 ` Jeff King
2018-02-22 16:16 ` Dorian Taylor
2018-02-22 20:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-02-22 20:12 ` Dorian Taylor
2018-03-03 5:27 ` [PATCH] smart-http: document flush after "# service" line Jeff King
2018-03-03 8:28 ` Eric Sunshine
2018-03-03 10:02 ` Jeff King
2018-02-22 17:52 ` Brandon Williams [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180222175219.GA185096@google.com \
--to=bmwill@google.com \
--cc=dorian.taylor.lists@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).