From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Michele Locati <michele@locati.it>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, gitster@pobox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] filter-branch: return 2 when nothing to rewrite
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 13:59:35 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180315175935.GA8752@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180315170918.1984-1-michele@locati.it>
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 06:09:18PM +0100, Michele Locati wrote:
> Using the --state-branch option allows us to perform incremental filtering.
> This may lead to having nothing to rewrite in subsequent filtering, so we need
> a way to recognize this case.
> So, let's exit with 2 instead of 1 when this "error" occurs.
Thanks, this looks good to me.
I did have one other thought while reading this, but I think it's OK to
leave as-is:
> +EXIT STATUS
> +-----------
> +
> +On success, the exit status is `0`. If the filter can't find any commits to
> +rewrite, the exit status is `2`. On any other error, the exit status may be
> +any other non-zero value.
I wondered if people might take "any commits to rewrite" to also mean
the case where the filters do not actually change any commits (e.g, and
index filter which removes a path that does not exist). That's currently
a successful outcome but does issue a warning; it's not changed by this
patch at all (and nor should it be).
If we wanted to make that more clear, we could perhaps mention the
--state-branch option here explicitly. Not sure if it's worth it.
-Peff
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-15 17:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-15 13:03 [PATCH] filter-branch: return 2 when nothing to rewrite Michele Locati
2018-03-15 14:12 ` Jeff King
2018-03-15 14:57 ` Michele Locati
2018-03-15 15:35 ` Jeff King
2018-03-15 15:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-03-15 15:48 ` Jeff King
2018-03-15 15:55 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-03-15 16:18 ` Michele Locati
2018-03-15 16:24 ` Jeff King
2018-03-15 17:09 ` [PATCH v2] " Michele Locati
2018-03-15 17:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-03-15 17:59 ` Jeff King [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180315175935.GA8752@sigill.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=michele@locati.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).