From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Harald Nordgren <haraldnordgren@gmail.com>
Cc: "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ls-remote: create option to sort by versions
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2018 13:46:15 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180402174614.GA28566@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHwyqnV1BwsaHVsh0xSx3MroNoJRT7UYrqF_WFKhkZMf-X9Evg@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 06:26:49PM +0200, Harald Nordgren wrote:
> It would be nice to have a uniform option like
> '--sort=version:refname'. But spending a few hours to look over the
> code, it seems that ls-remote.c would require a lot of rewrites if we
> wanted to start using `ref_array` and `ref_array_item` for storing the
> refs.
>
> Which seems necessary in order to hook in to the sorting flow used in
> other subcommands. That, or reimplement `cmp_ref_sorting`. But maybe
> I'm missing something?
I haven't looked at how painful it might be to use ref-filter.c, but it
would buy us even more if we could. That would open up other options
like --format, I think (OTOH there may be some funny corner cases; that
code assumes we're talking about local refs, so if you were to ask for
"%(committerdate)" or something, we might have to more cleanly handle
the case where we don't actually have the object).
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-02 17:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-02 0:52 [PATCH] ls-remote: create option to sort by versions Harald Nordgren
2018-04-02 6:37 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2018-04-02 16:26 ` Harald Nordgren
2018-04-02 17:32 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2018-04-02 17:42 ` Harald Nordgren
2018-04-02 17:46 ` Jeff King [this message]
2018-04-02 18:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-04-02 20:03 ` Harald Nordgren
2018-04-02 22:11 ` [PATCH v5] ls-remote: create '--sort' option Harald Nordgren
2018-04-02 22:53 ` Eric Sunshine
2018-04-02 22:54 ` Eric Sunshine
2018-04-03 0:48 ` [PATCH v6] " Harald Nordgren
2018-04-02 21:05 ` [PATCH v4] " Harald Nordgren
2018-04-04 17:11 ` [PATCH v7] " Harald Nordgren
2018-04-04 17:18 ` Harald Nordgren
2018-04-04 17:47 ` Harald Nordgren
2018-04-04 18:56 ` Jeff King
2018-04-04 18:55 ` Jeff King
2018-04-04 23:01 ` [PATCH v8] " Harald Nordgren
2018-04-04 23:11 ` Harald Nordgren
2018-04-06 18:58 ` Jeff King
2018-04-06 18:58 ` [PATCH 1/3] ref-filter: use "struct object_id" consistently Jeff King
2018-04-06 18:59 ` [PATCH 2/3] ref-filter: make ref_array_item allocation more consistent Jeff King
2018-04-06 18:59 ` [PATCH 3/3] ref-filter: factor ref_array pushing into its own function Jeff King
2018-04-06 19:27 ` Derrick Stolee
2018-04-07 15:22 ` Harald Nordgren
2018-04-08 23:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-04-09 3:57 ` Jeff King
2018-04-04 23:32 ` [PATCH v9] ls-remote: create '--sort' option Harald Nordgren
2018-04-05 0:04 ` [PATCH v10] " Harald Nordgren
2018-04-07 16:42 ` [PATCH v11 1/4] ref-filter: use "struct object_id" consistently Harald Nordgren
2018-04-08 1:06 ` Eric Sunshine
2018-04-08 12:27 ` Harald Nordgren
2018-04-07 16:42 ` [PATCH v11 2/4] ref-filter: make ref_array_item allocation more consistent Harald Nordgren
2018-04-07 16:42 ` [PATCH v11 3/4] ref-filter: factor ref_array pushing into its own function Harald Nordgren
2018-04-07 16:42 ` [PATCH v11 4/4] ls-remote: create '--sort' option Harald Nordgren
2018-04-08 1:48 ` Eric Sunshine
2018-04-08 12:28 ` [PATCH v12 1/4] ref-filter: use "struct object_id" consistently Harald Nordgren
2018-04-08 12:28 ` [PATCH v12 2/4] ref-filter: make ref_array_item allocation more consistent Harald Nordgren
2018-04-08 12:28 ` [PATCH v12 3/4] ref-filter: factor ref_array pushing into its own function Harald Nordgren
2018-04-08 12:28 ` [PATCH v12 4/4] ls-remote: create '--sort' option Harald Nordgren
2018-04-08 22:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-04-09 0:09 ` Harald Nordgren
2018-04-09 0:48 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-04-09 2:31 ` Eric Sunshine
2018-04-08 23:58 ` [PATCH v13 1/4] ref-filter: use "struct object_id" consistently Harald Nordgren
2018-04-08 23:58 ` [PATCH v13 2/4] ref-filter: make ref_array_item allocation more consistent Harald Nordgren
2018-04-08 23:58 ` [PATCH v13 3/4] ref-filter: factor ref_array pushing into its own function Harald Nordgren
2018-04-08 23:58 ` [PATCH v13 4/4] ls-remote: create '--sort' option Harald Nordgren
2018-04-09 0:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-04-09 1:45 ` Harald Nordgren
2018-04-09 1:42 ` [PATCH v14 1/4] ref-filter: use "struct object_id" consistently Harald Nordgren
2018-04-09 1:42 ` [PATCH v14 2/4] ref-filter: make ref_array_item allocation more consistent Harald Nordgren
2018-04-11 17:57 ` Harald Nordgren
2018-04-11 18:07 ` Stefan Beller
2018-04-11 18:30 ` Todd Zullinger
2018-04-11 18:56 ` Eric Sunshine
2018-04-11 23:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-04-09 1:42 ` [PATCH v14 3/4] ref-filter: factor ref_array pushing into its own function Harald Nordgren
2018-04-09 1:42 ` [PATCH v14 4/4] ls-remote: create '--sort' option Harald Nordgren
2018-05-12 8:45 ` René Scharfe
2018-05-12 9:55 ` Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180402174614.GA28566@sigill.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=haraldnordgren@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).