From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C8B51F424 for ; Wed, 9 May 2018 12:15:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934731AbeEIMPU convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 May 2018 08:15:20 -0400 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([217.72.192.75]:35135 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751052AbeEIMPT (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 May 2018 08:15:19 -0400 Received: from mail.cetitecgmbh.com ([87.190.42.90]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue102 [212.227.15.183]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lk8eg-1eihwZ20lu-00c7Uo; Wed, 09 May 2018 14:15:13 +0200 Received: from pflvmailgateway.corp.cetitec.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cetitecgmbh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3678A64A3C0; Wed, 9 May 2018 12:15:12 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cetitec.com Received: from mail.cetitecgmbh.com ([127.0.0.1]) by pflvmailgateway.corp.cetitec.com (pflvmailgateway.corp.cetitec.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N_IrG6WKf5WV; Wed, 9 May 2018 14:14:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pfwsexchange.corp.cetitec.com (unknown [10.10.1.99]) by mail.cetitecgmbh.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73B60647B9B; Wed, 9 May 2018 14:14:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pflmari.corp.cetitec.com (10.10.2.141) by PFWSEXCHANGE.corp.cetitec.com (10.10.1.99) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Wed, 9 May 2018 14:14:54 +0200 Received: by pflmari.corp.cetitec.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1E6BE804D2; Wed, 9 May 2018 14:14:54 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 9 May 2018 14:14:54 +0200 From: Alex Riesen To: Bert Wesarg CC: Paul Mackerras , Git Mailing List , Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] gitk: do not limit tree mode listing in the file list panel to current sub-directory Message-ID: <20180509121454.v4y4av3sk7nh4hnn@pflmari> References: <20180508121104.rtsrektxiihvpqtx@pflmari> <20180508122256.nyv6ddcoifygfpk4@pflmari> <20180508133905.6jhhhp6l7avjkctl@pflmari> <56ccabf699cdc6e15c5dcb73db5692180c79906d.1525863290.git.raa.lkml@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Originating-IP: [10.10.2.141] X-ClientProxiedBy: PFWSEXCHANGE.corp.cetitec.com (10.10.1.99) To PFWSEXCHANGE.corp.cetitec.com (10.10.1.99) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 180509-0, 09.05.2018), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:RIz9rNAesidfUbjLHxaxrxIYcZp9RCKUWQlEQD59Z0Ak/uZ80Mf 2L5Gm1Xo/vvq/GZGkCPpgcfu1huWd1xVq8skuYT5S5g5bIn/RngR1zxf7Eq+iZSIYrza2BO 62Izn9DdxW4gTxm+geR7Quvj/2kAvNf/BklplEtk5+Nj93KiF38kmJC/JhPbuWhXOd7PilL PjY/lLFM03iMFqjcLOkZw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:Z01XEolLBmQ=:kC4InKdWkS96U6c9A5pO/M WTS/n8LeEOpb2SJxG+9reaPOADig3pBSCD3IWw8VKupiGNWvvF+x0bO7tG/hqF6O+SIbA61s0 sscFcKHZgzrOF4gJXlfHENZDsEZDvbq3zctBI+3X9AH1A80GINvVDIk9RS2YxGC72KqmMAi5y hiqhGX+vJPz5Ujg2RisHLb6UDZo4h2x1Ulcx6VdrSYmKuQK4tVdJsPgOv2+1J5TMoes1S5Iix WrFKthYlrlDlRtUCsEPUad5yZ53WqahnaiiAg2puUTZiIjRBtvi3+d5HMRpFCylSUeRoWar0u BT37XWmOHWbgv8+gvRerI4ozSu3Zs9cOZjOJYU2KW1FkP8xJw5w590/PrY+Bt4UDSKppM5GpA CzUmyOBFUJkqPKZRlAGUtOITq+m7ohnxsUSHRQQYb99AmexorgS/LqZQCi9cXM9tp0LpmyM02 QdUY7fzAVi/CrEfsokmjiOGmTwudh9k42QiqEjaKlX6odul5rPM8v8Dyv1tyD6H4GNO+rbq1E 59nafAyEoF7FYcmz0q3QP+/FKeEuKj4zuJJpe5CrRCdWZsB1PQ3O9BEf7fUqWRIz0v71MTvtx MilKQgQi+QZvPNdMTQxDXvYqtnPRUHKWJ+8vz/Zqxnif86wxlmRzB5R2z/dZr6pD8F6RWDaQy 1mzh01ZQmsMokjTHGyUtFxSsIlJiENyJyHbFCalo6JYZi2chGt46C9bj5nzoFjdEhx4Y= Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Bert Wesarg, Wed, May 09, 2018 14:08:51 +0200: > >> I noticed that too, while testing your patch and I'm also confused. > >> But was not able to send a request to Paul yet. ls-tree --full-tree > >> seems to be one that should be used here, I think. > > > > Well, I just tried your suggestion. 'ls-files' doesn't have --full-tree, so > > for those it is just cd-up. > > > > It is on top of the re-sent series. > > I would consider the current behavior as a bug, therefor I would put > this patch first, and than your other fixes/enhancements. I might do, just want to hear more opinions on the matter: someone might have good reasons for the current behaviour and consider a bug the fact that Patch mode behaves differently, for instance. And as I completely screwed up the resend of the series, there will definitely be a re-resend. Regards, Alex --- Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren geprüft. https://www.avast.com/antivirus