git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>,
	Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] a few mark_parents_uninteresting cleanups
Date: Fri, 11 May 2018 14:00:30 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180511180029.GA11290@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)

This is a follow-up to the discussion from February:

  https://public-inbox.org/git/1519522496-73090-1-git-send-email-dstolee@microsoft.com/

There I theorized that some of these extra has_object_file() checks were
unnecessary. After poking around a bit, I've convinced myself that this
is the case, so here are some patches.

After Stolee's fix in ebbed3ba04 (revision.c: reduce object database
queries, 2018-02-24), I doubt this will provide any noticeable speedup.
IMHO the value is just in simplifying the logic.

The first two patches are the actual has_object_file simplifications.
The second two are an attempt to fix some head-scratching I had while
reading mark_parents_uninteresting(). I hope the result is easier to
follow, but I may have just shuffled one confusion for another. :)

  [1/4]: mark_tree_contents_uninteresting(): drop missing object check
  [2/4]: mark_parents_uninteresting(): drop missing object check
  [3/4]: mark_parents_uninteresting(): replace list with stack
  [4/4]: mark_parents_uninteresting(): avoid most allocation

 revision.c | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

-Peff

             reply	other threads:[~2018-05-11 18:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-11 18:00 Jeff King [this message]
2018-05-11 18:00 ` [PATCH 1/4] mark_tree_contents_uninteresting(): drop missing object check Jeff King
2018-05-11 18:01 ` [PATCH 2/4] mark_parents_uninteresting(): " Jeff King
2018-05-13  2:23   ` Junio C Hamano
2018-05-11 18:02 ` [PATCH 3/4] mark_parents_uninteresting(): replace list with stack Jeff King
2018-05-11 18:03 ` [PATCH 4/4] mark_parents_uninteresting(): avoid most allocation Jeff King
2018-05-14 12:47   ` Derrick Stolee
2018-05-14 13:09     ` Jeff King
2018-05-14 13:25       ` Derrick Stolee
2018-05-14 14:09         ` Jeff King
2018-05-14 12:50 ` [PATCH 0/4] a few mark_parents_uninteresting cleanups Derrick Stolee

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180511180029.GA11290@sigill.intra.peff.net \
    --to=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=dstolee@microsoft.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).