From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Santiago Torres <santiago@nyu.edu>
Cc: "Karel Kočí" <karel.koci@nic.cz>,
"brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>,
"Vojtech Myslivec" <vojtech.myslivec@nic.cz>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] verify-tag/verify-commit should exit unsuccessfully when signature is not trusted
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2018 12:06:34 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180803160634.GA19944@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180803154343.z3lgkudleood6lhs@LykOS.localdomain>
On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 11:43:44AM -0400, Santiago Torres wrote:
> > This is not a deviation. GPG correctly recognizes difference between trusted,
> > untrusted and unknown levels. git on the other hand does not. Well it did until
> > the commit a4cc18f29. That one removed GPG exit code propagation.
>
> Oh wow. Sorry my assumption parted from looking at the code back in the
> day where this happens. I assumed git was quietly propagating the gpg
> error code and took it from there.
>
> Now that I think about it though, verify tag can verify more than one
> tag. I assume that this would make it difficult to propagate individual
> errors in trusting. I honestly don't know what's the best way to modify
> this behavior then.
I think the only sensible thing is to err on the conservative side, and
return non-zero if we saw _any_ invalid signature.
I will note, though, that just checking the exit code of `verify-tag`
isn't really that thorough. It shows that there was _a_ signature, but
we don't know:
- if it was an identity the user would expect to be signing tags
- if it even matches the refname we used to find the tag
So I'd argue that any real verification needs to either have a human in
the loop, or implement a custom policy based on reading the full output.
I know we (and you specifically Santiago) talked about this a while ago,
and we ended up providing ways to get more information out of
verify-tag, so that a tool could sit on top of that and implement more
project-specific policy. I don't know offhand of any reusable tools that
do so, though.
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-03 16:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-31 20:05 [PATCH 1/1] verify-tag/verify-commit should exit unsuccessfully when signature is not trusted Vojtech Myslivec
2018-08-01 0:19 ` brian m. carlson
2018-08-01 0:25 ` Santiago Torres
2018-08-03 13:36 ` Karel Kočí
2018-08-03 15:43 ` Santiago Torres
2018-08-03 16:06 ` Jeff King [this message]
2018-08-04 8:43 ` Karel Kočí
2018-08-08 23:04 ` Jeff King
2018-08-08 23:12 ` brian m. carlson
2018-08-09 0:59 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-08-09 1:43 ` brian m. carlson
2018-08-09 14:30 ` Jeff King
2018-08-09 15:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-08-09 17:12 ` Jeff King
2018-08-09 18:40 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-08-09 19:50 ` Jeff King
2018-08-10 2:27 ` brian m. carlson
2018-08-13 15:14 ` Vojtech Myslivec
2018-08-03 17:32 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180803160634.GA19944@sigill.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=karel.koci@nic.cz \
--cc=sandals@crustytoothpaste.net \
--cc=santiago@nyu.edu \
--cc=vojtech.myslivec@nic.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).