git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Cc: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Contributor Summit planning
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 00:52:37 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180829045237.GA15274@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.1808271458450.73@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet>

On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 03:22:39PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:

> Having said that, I believe that we core contributors can learn to have a
> fruitful online meeting. With 30+ participants, too.
> 
> Learning from my past life in academia (it is hard for me to imagine a
> less disciplined crowd than a bunch of white, male, old scientists), we
> would need a moderator, and some forum that allows to "give somebody the
> mic". That software/platform should exist somewhere.

Yes, I agree that software tools could help a lot with a crowd that
size. I have used various "virtual classroom" tools before, and I think
the core of the idea is there, but I was often unimpressed by the
execution (and expense). So if you know of a good tool, it might be
worth trying.

> I would love to have the best of both worlds. For example, it is an annual
> annoyance that we are discussion all kinds of things regarding Git, trying
> to steer the direction, to form collaborations on certain features, and
> the person at the helm is not even there.
> 
> Maybe *two* meetings per year, one attached to GitMerge, and one purely
> online, would help.

I'm somewhat skeptical of the utility of an online meeting. That said,
I'm willing give it a try (or any other scheme people want to come up
with, for that matter).

> Point in favor of the pure-online meeting: the informal standup on IRC
> every second Friday. I really try to attend it (it is a bit awkward
> because it is on a Friday evening in my timezone, right at the time when I
> want to unwind from the work week), as it does have a similar effect to
> in-person standups: surprising collaborations spring up, unexpected help,
> and a general sense of belonging.

Yes, I've been meaning to make it to another one (I popped in for one a
month or two ago, and it didn't seem like much of anything was
happening).

What time is it, again?

> Such an online summit as I suggested above would really only work if
> enough frequent contributors would attend. If enough people like you,
> Junio, and the standup regulars would say: yep, we're willing to plan and
> attend an online summit, where we try to have a timezone-friendly
> "unconference"-style meeting on one day (on which we would of course try
> to free ourselves from our regular work obligations).
> 
> I guess I am asking for a "raise your hands", with mine high up in the
> air.

I'll come if you want to organize it.

-Peff

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-08-29  4:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-13 16:31 Contributor Summit planning Jeff King
2018-08-13 16:58 ` Derrick Stolee
2018-08-13 17:15   ` Jeff King
2018-08-27 13:22     ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-08-27 13:30       ` Derrick Stolee
2018-08-28 12:22         ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-08-28 19:06         ` Jonathan Nieder
2018-08-28 19:11           ` Jonathan Nieder
2018-08-29 14:38           ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-08-29  4:52       ` Jeff King [this message]
2018-08-29 14:44         ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-08-13 17:46 ` Stefan Beller
2018-08-14  4:31   ` Christian Couder
2018-08-14 14:35     ` Jeff King
2018-08-13 18:49 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2018-08-13 19:44   ` Jeff King
2018-08-13 20:36   ` Junio C Hamano
2018-08-13 20:41     ` Stefan Beller
2018-08-13 21:06       ` Jeff King
2018-08-13 21:19         ` Stefan Beller
2018-08-13 21:54           ` Jeff King
2018-08-14 17:43             ` Measuring Community Involvement (was Re: Contributor Summit planning) Derrick Stolee
2018-08-14 19:36               ` Jeff King
2018-08-14 19:47                 ` Stefan Beller
2018-08-14 20:06                   ` Jeff King
2018-08-15  7:12                     ` Eric Wong
2018-08-14 20:42                 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-08-27 15:54                   ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-08-15 16:28               ` Duy Nguyen
2018-08-27 15:55                 ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-08-14 14:30         ` Contributor Summit planning Duy Nguyen
2018-08-14 14:47           ` Jeff King
2018-08-14 16:57             ` Stefan Beller
2018-08-14 20:59             ` Junio C Hamano
2018-08-17 15:18       ` Duy Nguyen
2018-08-27 22:49   ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-08-29  5:02     ` Jeff King
2018-08-14  6:52 ` Elijah Newren
2018-08-14 13:25   ` Randall S. Becker
2018-08-14 14:06     ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2018-08-14 14:30       ` Jeff King
2018-08-14 14:28     ` Jeff King
2018-08-27 13:34 ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-08-29  4:55   ` Jeff King
2018-08-29 14:46     ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-08-30  3:20       ` Jeff King
2018-08-30 11:36         ` Johannes Schindelin
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-03-03 10:30 Jeff King
2018-03-03 10:39 ` Jeff King
2018-03-05 14:29   ` Derrick Stolee
2018-03-05 17:01   ` Brandon Williams
2018-03-05 18:29   ` Lars Schneider
2018-03-05 18:53     ` Jonathan Nieder
2018-03-05 22:13       ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2018-03-05 21:57     ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2018-03-05 14:34 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180829045237.GA15274@sigill.intra.peff.net \
    --to=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stolee@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).