From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Cc: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Contributor Summit planning
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 00:52:37 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180829045237.GA15274@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.1808271458450.73@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet>
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 03:22:39PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Having said that, I believe that we core contributors can learn to have a
> fruitful online meeting. With 30+ participants, too.
>
> Learning from my past life in academia (it is hard for me to imagine a
> less disciplined crowd than a bunch of white, male, old scientists), we
> would need a moderator, and some forum that allows to "give somebody the
> mic". That software/platform should exist somewhere.
Yes, I agree that software tools could help a lot with a crowd that
size. I have used various "virtual classroom" tools before, and I think
the core of the idea is there, but I was often unimpressed by the
execution (and expense). So if you know of a good tool, it might be
worth trying.
> I would love to have the best of both worlds. For example, it is an annual
> annoyance that we are discussion all kinds of things regarding Git, trying
> to steer the direction, to form collaborations on certain features, and
> the person at the helm is not even there.
>
> Maybe *two* meetings per year, one attached to GitMerge, and one purely
> online, would help.
I'm somewhat skeptical of the utility of an online meeting. That said,
I'm willing give it a try (or any other scheme people want to come up
with, for that matter).
> Point in favor of the pure-online meeting: the informal standup on IRC
> every second Friday. I really try to attend it (it is a bit awkward
> because it is on a Friday evening in my timezone, right at the time when I
> want to unwind from the work week), as it does have a similar effect to
> in-person standups: surprising collaborations spring up, unexpected help,
> and a general sense of belonging.
Yes, I've been meaning to make it to another one (I popped in for one a
month or two ago, and it didn't seem like much of anything was
happening).
What time is it, again?
> Such an online summit as I suggested above would really only work if
> enough frequent contributors would attend. If enough people like you,
> Junio, and the standup regulars would say: yep, we're willing to plan and
> attend an online summit, where we try to have a timezone-friendly
> "unconference"-style meeting on one day (on which we would of course try
> to free ourselves from our regular work obligations).
>
> I guess I am asking for a "raise your hands", with mine high up in the
> air.
I'll come if you want to organize it.
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-29 4:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-13 16:31 Contributor Summit planning Jeff King
2018-08-13 16:58 ` Derrick Stolee
2018-08-13 17:15 ` Jeff King
2018-08-27 13:22 ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-08-27 13:30 ` Derrick Stolee
2018-08-28 12:22 ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-08-28 19:06 ` Jonathan Nieder
2018-08-28 19:11 ` Jonathan Nieder
2018-08-29 14:38 ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-08-29 4:52 ` Jeff King [this message]
2018-08-29 14:44 ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-08-13 17:46 ` Stefan Beller
2018-08-14 4:31 ` Christian Couder
2018-08-14 14:35 ` Jeff King
2018-08-13 18:49 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2018-08-13 19:44 ` Jeff King
2018-08-13 20:36 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-08-13 20:41 ` Stefan Beller
2018-08-13 21:06 ` Jeff King
2018-08-13 21:19 ` Stefan Beller
2018-08-13 21:54 ` Jeff King
2018-08-14 17:43 ` Measuring Community Involvement (was Re: Contributor Summit planning) Derrick Stolee
2018-08-14 19:36 ` Jeff King
2018-08-14 19:47 ` Stefan Beller
2018-08-14 20:06 ` Jeff King
2018-08-15 7:12 ` Eric Wong
2018-08-14 20:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-08-27 15:54 ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-08-15 16:28 ` Duy Nguyen
2018-08-27 15:55 ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-08-14 14:30 ` Contributor Summit planning Duy Nguyen
2018-08-14 14:47 ` Jeff King
2018-08-14 16:57 ` Stefan Beller
2018-08-14 20:59 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-08-17 15:18 ` Duy Nguyen
2018-08-27 22:49 ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-08-29 5:02 ` Jeff King
2018-08-14 6:52 ` Elijah Newren
2018-08-14 13:25 ` Randall S. Becker
2018-08-14 14:06 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2018-08-14 14:30 ` Jeff King
2018-08-14 14:28 ` Jeff King
2018-08-27 13:34 ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-08-29 4:55 ` Jeff King
2018-08-29 14:46 ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-08-30 3:20 ` Jeff King
2018-08-30 11:36 ` Johannes Schindelin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-03-03 10:30 Jeff King
2018-03-03 10:39 ` Jeff King
2018-03-05 14:29 ` Derrick Stolee
2018-03-05 17:01 ` Brandon Williams
2018-03-05 18:29 ` Lars Schneider
2018-03-05 18:53 ` Jonathan Nieder
2018-03-05 22:13 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2018-03-05 21:57 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2018-03-05 14:34 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180829045237.GA15274@sigill.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stolee@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).