From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93ED91F428 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 08:19:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727653AbeH3MUp (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Aug 2018 08:20:45 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([104.130.231.41]:33702 "HELO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1727622AbeH3MUp (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Aug 2018 08:20:45 -0400 Received: (qmail 14704 invoked by uid 109); 30 Aug 2018 08:19:47 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with SMTP; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 08:19:47 +0000 Authentication-Results: cloud.peff.net; auth=none Received: (qmail 24740 invoked by uid 111); 30 Aug 2018 08:19:56 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with (ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) SMTP; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 04:19:56 -0400 Authentication-Results: peff.net; auth=none Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 30 Aug 2018 04:19:45 -0400 Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 04:19:45 -0400 From: Jeff King To: Eric Wong Cc: Johannes Schindelin , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Thank you for public-inbox! Message-ID: <20180830081945.GB10224@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <20180829050745.GD15274@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20180829100243.GA28180@dcvr> <20180830033000.GD665@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20180830072049.dgsjn3537xzo6qcm@dcvr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180830072049.dgsjn3537xzo6qcm@dcvr> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 07:20:49AM +0000, Eric Wong wrote: > > At the very least, I think if we plan to reference without an http URL > > that we would use something like URI-ish, like . That gives > > tools a better chance to say "OK, I know how to find message-ids" > > (though I still think that it's much less helpful out of the box > > compared to an http URL). > > That would be awesome if somelike like could be a > standard and adopted (likewise with ). > > I haven't checked, but are there existing/similar RFCs? > Surely somebody has tried to get > adopted by now, right? There's https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2392. They even call it "mid:". :) I don't know of any git URI scheme, though it's similar in spirit to magnet: links. Those are a bit verbose, though, because they're really a meta-format for a bunch of different content-addressable schemes. -Peff