From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33AD21F428 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 01:14:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727273AbeHaFTP (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Aug 2018 01:19:15 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-f178.google.com ([209.85.214.178]:44454 "EHLO mail-pl1-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727197AbeHaFTP (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Aug 2018 01:19:15 -0400 Received: by mail-pl1-f178.google.com with SMTP id ba4-v6so4613054plb.11 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 18:14:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=PNUJ0CyVhZPvNuj+b/qN62i/BnIfylLJcf213kgZ9XM=; b=HuQVW2ptLU4sIgGg6VUETy4LqXgF8t2lzB5n256UmX/pWOb55mnjmKVUAttF7TDk0V W1kdap2d3GmY69mzqgF3/OaI5u5UEMFRzkWMnpLQzHsoG9eQw+dXNw4etqAYvoBs465y UUhLUjwU9jO/CJ/mJtszC/6YuKo6vjxd/9CzIQHiL/wJMgkwBTgBahb6Gk72Nf/1b1QO B3IikO6QiIDjAGK0L7guzyYSC4oyM6/Mn1HiTMvn1v8fDcbLoubBVNEr5a5vDUvh/fDK iVaRh1PnQ6dY5X2xwZXZuMAeuaBkkTUsEUb3Xl5uU+wIfEng6enWRYXM1YEJtEvmF6J4 nxiQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=PNUJ0CyVhZPvNuj+b/qN62i/BnIfylLJcf213kgZ9XM=; b=bpnNHtAHco/pt6VmC1nDvU2U2joWvW9jzYXx7eq6YYM0yHyEZdfj/rvh3ABwXaIoAd S4aKLLocUwt/yfCJtW9FpyCfmqU9rrRo6o4GLkQlbgP08Up3aBnOBleYrDBDckhbZry9 Y+a/xAASrEfgENnX5IZ6X9qfQKP+b+ZejH6wokspAUqO/Ea12XJ8CJSZr6FZd9Hy4ZZX 8p43y/L16ss7yd7DyYpxQ+hQ1o/Wev4RWpIGJvnVgYPVa6QpxDmUkUb8KgCOvDn95eEW 8QWpMHVTPUG/+2lTBiUGh0ZAAGSKBRRozmzOFjynk/BV39f1jncNf/TBIO3Gx07li6as tvFw== X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51BCdFkjJyVykzdTyj5ofttnZaaVlF0LBqzVGsuKqILk8fkBASkJ Lr6aGbw+/vMNAgvtcZKIg1K+lrSU X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdYO38aWacOgYLjReZN/ooe29SZNWgKZz4NalNegs53EqjkzGqlqJuhtFkU/zc5LbCasNXDFXQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:9f90:: with SMTP id g16-v6mr12918180plq.34.1535678060487; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 18:14:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aiede.svl.corp.google.com ([2620:0:100e:422:4187:1d6c:d3d6:9ce6]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s27-v6sm18839070pfk.133.2018.08.30.18.14.19 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 30 Aug 2018 18:14:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 18:14:17 -0700 From: Jonathan Nieder To: Eric Wong Cc: Jeff King , Johannes Schindelin , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Thank you for public-inbox! Message-ID: <20180831011417.GA98946@aiede.svl.corp.google.com> References: <20180829050745.GD15274@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20180829100243.GA28180@dcvr> <20180830033000.GD665@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20180830035609.GA140348@aiede.svl.corp.google.com> <20180830072043.GA14514@dcvr.yhbt.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180830072043.GA14514@dcvr.yhbt.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Eric Wong wrote: > Jonathan Nieder wrote: >> Jeff King wrote: >>> I guess I just wonder if I set up a mirror on another domain, would >>> anybody actually _use_ it? I'd think most people would just go to >>> public-inbox.org as the de facto URL. >> >> If it's faster than public-inbox.org and you don't mind the traffic I >> would send, then I'll use it. :) > > Is performance a problem on public-inbox.org for you? It's pretty fast. I'm just very, very picky about latency. ;-) It's good to know you're interested in which corner cases are bad. The next time I have a noticeably slow page load, I'll contact meta@. [...] > I've also been sorta considering downgrading to a $5/month VPS > (from a $20/month VPS) to force myself to pay more attention to > performance while saving myself a few bucks. But I wouldn't get > to dogfood on SMP, anymore... Sounds reasonable to me. If performance gets bad, that's just a reason for people to help out (either with patches or e.g. with donated VMs for hosting). Speaking of the latter: what are your current resource requirements? E.g. which of the dimensions in [1] do you not fit into? Thanks, Jonathan [1] https://cloud.google.com/free/docs/always-free-usage-limits#compute_name