From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EECD61F404 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2018 20:14:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726341AbeIHA5P (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Sep 2018 20:57:15 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-f194.google.com ([209.85.215.194]:44797 "EHLO mail-pg1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726060AbeIHA5P (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Sep 2018 20:57:15 -0400 Received: by mail-pg1-f194.google.com with SMTP id r1-v6so7489736pgp.11 for ; Fri, 07 Sep 2018 13:14:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=VY0nGoKDfnb9Yf8FKW8wUTMZR8R6xZVKus1dARO8ZKU=; b=SBVqnw5oY1j0hrkjo9CkjgtRIZTKpj9n7Em0sI1b9FUgCRWfXMB9jbkktyzU/ObD4v WDLaq7V1l2vO8cbjmQN8pTVuUseSzUe/3xfRsrQVEf922Aa9DEyWouuAeelTkgWSZcof hJF3mkXWfzUA9zzp+k/CCZ/a0vUisgCAv9JH3PtXfjABs71mNIm1K96bqBvZ/u100Kzp NDh1YTHwbUo2IvFH73PhVyLlOg8MniLw7uSuqfPBDPxixFGAZzb1osQ0BxzPh1nbemTA 6nk45F4vWue+8oy3oPPoc1lJSD+4FSalf7mzXPW4gfrHbPjiVGTTsZgLwBq0luyp6aqk 4Ajg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=VY0nGoKDfnb9Yf8FKW8wUTMZR8R6xZVKus1dARO8ZKU=; b=EWiWzEhvJSuPZ0lsb3Xmfqyc1AmgzemZVKVgvMg7xSlsTy5MC7+39bUSk87o5mfqU9 5uacrYHhwz8QpUFcdUrZmfR2987eOgbcHKFNW8LHCZEvtYlMksrwtGa2xO7OgFP0wagU gkNJKGJr1e6BSYmfeEWrg+Tp31+FxY/lnqT5KO6lENV/t7xtxAZtxPMGMctXUe2eE1dw 42NP9+4qk3WI6MkekIwnDOTlS0TieO3gr8hKxZpbJRBL+P3+wMDsgIONhXhFrNF27UKU cRusLjKdB0Ceb5jgls2I43Sioo1cFn9zuwcH7Sx1Fw81guKQ1peOYonbbjAy6kSV7yYa QSCA== X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51CN1VGdMi+cJTD9WLg81ZWuHeWECwknYMGaPrae+iZnDdyJFMCT GGGZvzCtTpKiEsLMsFPANRQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdY11Z82DE9Q9sbIIH0bpR2luYl/zhzQ+z88O9sDl0fFGrz7oq+0anDoQG0K7tJnjgcLkjy2Kw== X-Received: by 2002:a63:f002:: with SMTP id k2-v6mr10016703pgh.8.1536351282315; Fri, 07 Sep 2018 13:14:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aiede.svl.corp.google.com ([2620:0:100e:422:4187:1d6c:d3d6:9ce6]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g5-v6sm13543589pfc.77.2018.09.07.13.14.41 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Fri, 07 Sep 2018 13:14:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2018 13:14:40 -0700 From: Jonathan Nieder To: Allan Sandfeld Jensen Cc: Jeff King , Stefan Beller , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Old submodules broken in 2.19rc1 and 2.19rc2 Message-ID: <20180907201440.GB103699@aiede.svl.corp.google.com> References: <2659750.rG6xLiZASK@twilight> <20180907150327.GB26719@sigill.intra.peff.net> <1591523.hyI6sBWrkQ@twilight> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1591523.hyI6sBWrkQ@twilight> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Hi, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote: > I discovered it by using Debian testing, and it is shipping the 2.17rcs for > some reason. I believe you mean Debian unstable. Debian testing has 2.18.0. > The example is just an old checkout of qt5.git with submodules, > it is rather large. Do you have a reproduction recipe I can use (starting with a "git clone" command I would run using an old version of Git, etc)? > I could try bisecting, but I am not sure I have the time anytime soon, I just > wanted to report it to you first incase you knew of a change that suddenly > assumed the new structure. This is definitely not an intentional change, so more details would be very welcome. Thanks, Jonathan