From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8840B211B3 for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2018 17:37:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726439AbeLDRhZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Dec 2018 12:37:25 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f68.google.com ([209.85.221.68]:34983 "EHLO mail-wr1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726056AbeLDRhZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Dec 2018 12:37:25 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f68.google.com with SMTP id 96so16896906wrb.2 for ; Tue, 04 Dec 2018 09:37:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=BH7iqN3/V/6wfI9SX+/Fyvmgyrfn/hkM6bH8J/hkAas=; b=d1W/4DtlFDZbyk3r12pleTLXyiAC21DBu9Bz0+C3JvbMClDOXmzfj1SXRnJ9yOeT/J eowjXOT/Oqz9zs+y2EeBruc2Q1gA9nQkhxkJ7qylFQKH3Yh1LMP2WqJhcoNghBnCGOpc pWMJdsYUYKF3CJAKM5dyPuRSB3yDkEUerXNlcFHUqk74BtHuwGiPZrmXPwLNEa6pLB7m h1LEXJqsEi9+jNHOo4vOt/4fvZYRkAvIVAcwZ7gt3lSVXZNwpLhQEbcZW4UQsPOYd/fy +WIRXgdtqfLGGJ1QzXuH6AYRyURAmKPkeBLV2I2LRMB4r2oz8J+4ZSGbyTagYvGte6Fq 0/EQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=BH7iqN3/V/6wfI9SX+/Fyvmgyrfn/hkM6bH8J/hkAas=; b=gh8ryQLtnbU2ovxlwzQa8emfS5pdgQlQMaEEmohUqi+8Q9ziCzIusaVBqtT19JAfft vxBhDlap++pIYw9wldICSPg60d1YVIOVFs88LfrxFrRY2IKrH3QVG9Qq/mkj3POF4rwB 5qlj9EsPb75M1GYZREHsBjdEg4ppskakDNoMh0hzi/ZLjUf60zowoEZHIaMqBAf7A+Kk gxxo/yhZGvn2dw7v1jWr66UdNrrJzeLT2/2oXB6LWp7tHOcZqwPHZ3MTXnEYx+7XdHWa 8UOczwfRPn0xSojzNOMgYZCcjo5cyqxdglMHTfQoD5GGoKqnklEmyecMwuqoL191LcQ6 Jwrw== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWbcTMfvnryxuxtTSBLDYLjm48Pl4ny9tRTC8mfdWgLP324vGjav Nlt/T2zsmoqf6aBRntSdL2s= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/VXc/3F28Dy4DhpG/1we4OQgdfVAbAuNpSKYJn3mCgQuX87aq1VQ3RCwbBCuNeuOFmrmRWc7A== X-Received: by 2002:adf:92a4:: with SMTP id 33mr2616611wrn.11.1543945044178; Tue, 04 Dec 2018 09:37:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from szeder.dev (x4db19e3e.dyn.telefonica.de. [77.177.158.62]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i192sm10254970wmg.7.2018.12.04.09.37.22 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 04 Dec 2018 09:37:23 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2018 18:37:21 +0100 From: SZEDER =?utf-8?B?R8OhYm9y?= To: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff King Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] test-lib: add the '--stress' option to run a test repeatedly under load Message-ID: <20181204173721.GI30222@szeder.dev> References: <20181204163457.15717-1-szeder.dev@gmail.com> <20181204163457.15717-4-szeder.dev@gmail.com> <87o9a1z0j5.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87o9a1z0j5.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 06:04:14PM +0100, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 04 2018, SZEDER Gábor wrote: > > > The number of parallel invocations is determined by, in order of > > precedence: the number specified as '--stress=', or the value of > > the GIT_TEST_STRESS_LOAD environment variable, or twice the number of > > available processors in '/proc/cpuinfo', or 8. > > With this series we have at least 3 ways to get this number. First > online_cpus() in the C code, then Peff's recent `getconf > _NPROCESSORS_ONLN` in doc-diff, and now this /proc/cpuinfo parsing. > > Perhaps it makes sense to split online_cpus() into a helper to use from > the shellscripts instead? I don't think so, but I will update this patch to use 'getconf' instead.