From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Sebastian Staudt <koraktor@gmail.com>
Cc: Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] Add tests for describe with --work-tree
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 08:00:32 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190129130031.GA22211@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190129051859.12830-1-koraktor@gmail.com>
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 06:18:57AM +0100, Sebastian Staudt wrote:
> The dirty ones are already passing, but just because describe is comparing
> with the wrong working tree.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Staudt <koraktor@gmail.com>
> ---
> t/t6120-describe.sh | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/t/t6120-describe.sh b/t/t6120-describe.sh
> index d639d94696..c863c4f600 100755
> --- a/t/t6120-describe.sh
> +++ b/t/t6120-describe.sh
> @@ -145,14 +145,38 @@ check_describe A-* HEAD
>
> check_describe "A-*[0-9a-f]" --dirty
>
> +test_expect_success 'describe --dirty with --work-tree' "
This should be marked as test_expect_failure, I think, because it does
not yet pass (and then flipped s/failure/success/ in the next patch).
> + (
> + cd '$TEST_DIRECTORY' &&
> + git --git-dir '$TRASH_DIRECTORY/.git' --work-tree '$TRASH_DIRECTORY' describe --dirty >'$TRASH_DIRECTORY/out'
> + ) &&
The quoting you've done here is unusual for our test suite, and not
quite as robust. You've put the whole test snippet into double-quotes,
which means that $TRASH_DIRECTORY, etc, will be expanded before we eval
the code.
By putting single-quotes around $TRASH_DIRECTORY, that makes it work
when the path contains a space. But it would fail if somebody's
filesystem path contains a single-quote.
The usual style is to put the whole snippet into single-quotes, and then
double-quote as appropriate within it. Like:
test_expect_failure 'describe --dirty with --work-tree' '
(
cd "$TEST_DIRECTORY" &&
git --git-dir "$TRASH_DIRECTORY/.git" ...etc
Those variables will be expanded when test_expect_failure eval's the
snippet.
> + grep 'A-\d\+-g[0-9a-f]\+' '$TRASH_DIRECTORY/out'
Using "\d" isn't portable.
This regex is pretty broad. What are we checking here? If I understand
the previous discussion, we just care that it doesn't have "dirty" in
it, right? I don't think this regex does that, because it doesn't anchor
the end of string.
If that's indeed what we're checking, then an easier check is perhaps:
! grep dirty ...
As a side note, you can also shorten your references to "out" by
referring to it from the trash directory itself. I.e.:
(
cd "$TEST_DIRECTORY" &&
git --git-dir="$TRASH_DIRECTORY/.git" --work-tree "$TRASH_DIRECTORY" \
describe --dirty
) >out &&
! grep dirty out
Same thing, but IMHO a little easier to read.
> check_describe "A-*[0-9a-f]-dirty" --dirty
>
> +test_expect_success 'describe --dirty with --work-tree' "
> [...]
Same comments apply to the other blocks you added.
Other than those mechanical things, though, what the tests are actually
trying to do seems quite reasonable to me.
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-29 13:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-29 5:18 [PATCH v3 1/3] Add tests for describe with --work-tree Sebastian Staudt
2019-01-29 5:18 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] Setup working tree in describe Sebastian Staudt
2019-01-29 13:11 ` Jeff King
2019-01-29 17:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-01-29 20:53 ` Eric Sunshine
2019-01-29 22:35 ` Jeff King
2019-01-30 10:31 ` Sebastian Staudt
2019-01-30 12:44 ` Jeff King
2019-01-29 5:18 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] Add test for describe with a bare repository Sebastian Staudt
2019-01-29 13:12 ` Jeff King
2019-01-30 10:23 ` Sebastian Staudt
2019-01-29 13:00 ` Jeff King [this message]
2019-01-29 17:47 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] Add tests for describe with --work-tree Junio C Hamano
2019-01-30 10:23 ` Sebastian Staudt
2019-01-30 12:43 ` Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190129130031.GA22211@sigill.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=koraktor@gmail.com \
--cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).