From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ECB21F453 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 11:28:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726154AbfBVL2I (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Feb 2019 06:28:08 -0500 Received: from mail-pg1-f193.google.com ([209.85.215.193]:36965 "EHLO mail-pg1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726090AbfBVL2H (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Feb 2019 06:28:07 -0500 Received: by mail-pg1-f193.google.com with SMTP id q206so1021143pgq.4 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 03:28:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Dr+6LrWOlKq1ONwr70jWSyPIVEh7Tb3g0XfCeqnZhXE=; b=EQHjqMGwXyR8WnmMIsz44CqnuETs4tJiMgGOT+jh94CJB5LJHcS8JuUi0DyzneumGi F/qkYR95dq9n9G4RTpIvCfJS2MLBgrQ2IZHhPL6uGMRZNEb+0ZfxKZdsd9oEjepgWrYK 5mDSjX13gjt1OvX3TQO0w2SM8EVkL0YriG9MB6d+ZQLNSPkFUeqDhahBQFpHy7+BlyVw E4bFiumPZnCuIwD/wpnbAaCpDr8rNGOTVpI3BYNYnGYRmXurYoM1cszijmPzuaWFXBJi 6x1pVjODN3EeQcmd+nWFerhdeiAOENup9V8kvPKatq4AAumrVfBIhNuZHfgdblLaFOlj +XyQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Dr+6LrWOlKq1ONwr70jWSyPIVEh7Tb3g0XfCeqnZhXE=; b=SvY46rLJg7K2Eq7bJU7J75NyEVBHYhIKxiJVtYk+X8mtT2/eipBVfIjBQt0cnM9c+K dKk5jRq9Xj6jn+8HvZqxA92TsoX+PEYQ3TpMkEcY0BfCfrnnPKowQoMVNSlxhwJYyIzZ nZZD752QI/z1Gsc2l7E2L+B2N+pCzYXo7EDCd11tmNKm7l81ZAq8kAsnh86WaQYPWx58 NYU3E+lZNjswzu8HBJX0EhJUt3Zm+7vDyyCEES7FL4VGElZZcdltP2DDVuBcZ6MC8fh9 tTTxH2o6QsDK/81f23FYPZXjCbqZAiCT2rEkZZ8l6U19/WgQ4YXD2QkXHB4EIpBDJQzq 7bfw== X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuZP6mEyqMAg/fP9aHcgvMhK+wX1qfthJ0GpYBFsiSrMtLrz+yAN 1+2L0Ly2sbhtUDCuDcoNs0yhH+4m X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IY5uAe67rmpyYcSiDiesMz5a52Dzpq8sO/8dZL2uZoyc8N38y+Q+mNF2J6RPCWCTWOE0CS1Kg== X-Received: by 2002:a63:6a88:: with SMTP id f130mr3530910pgc.114.1550834886469; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 03:28:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from ash ([115.72.21.220]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v15sm1754553pgf.75.2019.02.22.03.28.03 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 22 Feb 2019 03:28:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by ash (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 22 Feb 2019 18:28:01 +0700 From: =?UTF-8?q?Nguy=E1=BB=85n=20Th=C3=A1i=20Ng=E1=BB=8Dc=20Duy?= To: git@vger.kernel.org Cc: Junio C Hamano , =?UTF-8?q?Nguy=E1=BB=85n=20Th=C3=A1i=20Ng=E1=BB=8Dc=20Duy?= Subject: [PATCH] Delete check-racy.c Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 18:27:57 +0700 Message-Id: <20190222112757.20035-1-pclouds@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0.rc1.337.gdf7f8d0522 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org This is git-checy-racy command, added a long time ago [1] and was never part of the default build. Naturally after some makefile changes [2], git-check-racy was no longer recognized as a build target. Even if it compiles to day, it will not link after the introduction of common-main.c [3]. Racy index has not been a problem for a long time [4]. It's time to let this code go. I briefly consider if check-racy should be part of test-tool. But I don't think it's worth the effort. [1] 42f774063d (Add check program "git-check-racy" - 2006-08-15) [2] c373991375 (Makefile: list generated object files in OBJECTS - 2010-01-26) [3] 3f2e2297b9 (add an extra level of indirection to main() - 2016-07-01) [4] I pretend I don't remember anything about the recent split-index's racy problem Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy --- check-racy.c (gone) | 28 ---------------------------- 1 file changed, 28 deletions(-) diff --git a/check-racy.c b/check-racy.c deleted file mode 100644 index 24b6542352..0000000000 --- a/check-racy.c +++ /dev/null @@ -1,28 +0,0 @@ -#include "cache.h" - -int main(int ac, char **av) -{ - int i; - int dirty, clean, racy; - - dirty = clean = racy = 0; - read_cache(); - for (i = 0; i < active_nr; i++) { - struct cache_entry *ce = active_cache[i]; - struct stat st; - - if (lstat(ce->name, &st)) { - error_errno("lstat(%s)", ce->name); - continue; - } - - if (ce_match_stat(ce, &st, 0)) - dirty++; - else if (ce_match_stat(ce, &st, CE_MATCH_RACY_IS_DIRTY)) - racy++; - else - clean++; - } - printf("dirty %d, clean %d, racy %d\n", dirty, clean, racy); - return 0; -} -- 2.21.0.rc1.337.gdf7f8d0522