From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FSL_HELO_FAKE, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL shortcircuit=no autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2000020248 for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 18:22:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731661AbfDQSWI (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Apr 2019 14:22:08 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-f194.google.com ([209.85.210.194]:36726 "EHLO mail-pf1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730799AbfDQSWI (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Apr 2019 14:22:08 -0400 Received: by mail-pf1-f194.google.com with SMTP id z5so12482132pfn.3 for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 11:22:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=tgzHhR9MB3P4LUULYo7Rlcu+23wQq6gNRhqiCQ6xbbE=; b=hSUrN8gZogXFG+yJpF7rL4XN7eNv3y/48OVpRcw0zIqDXa2x3CMfvmmD8WEV6Z9bnO l/EKkkE3OBK/1/L1EirXUiuLMtTqrMnrD/HR/IxyVYhZPluKh7KWndM7vne9zd5cZYy/ acgiAOQoSipcsNJAllkOeKjYzDvT0DXv1S2H6VoRLeuKv/acrryCyk+HvkKRT9rL4P6X 9W7FDaGdXKfWsi6xdC+A5pG1DzZlzzjSW+SmZVpIYq6+pQPObfGrdhV6SyIoetRS4YTb O7Ih8lNmdhyiixDndteov7Yr2MmoAnmxi4vFwuj5iWfZ48Oi4svgZGuIBBeXG3Euchcd HRlw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=tgzHhR9MB3P4LUULYo7Rlcu+23wQq6gNRhqiCQ6xbbE=; b=XO8oEEhKsYvAHsKa0Z9EtaA/O6gx7GkBje7W7MyayR5+MDh+L34p525l1UHlKmMfyO LoODshXpszrCPg2L+iNBzD1lu9/j2SLn/M0F9lSMFErNXGXCiNRF+RCA7tRT03Yo/igm V+y/m9qUWbYqpOZ40kEP61s9ytUsy7p1uLTwBC1LhChQTXQUG7iZx12qctORg+wVsZlo 15RDliikKIu/wA3aujdyNP215tKUOxuvQ8rkEBa2kaeiZdpQHmvrcbxbS5zEkMLteiOU hFCWgZuJ4yKvBEGGMNK2owmV75v3LP4b0E2t2w3l4gbfN9xhz1tXSrMwD+lIu/ZXgsgU 35bg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWbSYGuqJPZpAT3AhBX1d0xW48vmsmsCzr7EK+8W1swDfQnaH6t +K6/+YDT3moOI8RtSgqhGX3i/w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwDx3pONdRfxfQCZnq4Ijgz8PnLh1DX8QPp8lbSVZs6MBseu63s81/ulQr5iw8ZG9ohFxxkAg== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:943b:: with SMTP id y27mr66831985pfo.59.1555525327110; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 11:22:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com ([2620:0:100e:913:5bb:3076:546:99b0]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n1sm61719517pgv.19.2019.04.17.11.22.05 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 17 Apr 2019 11:22:06 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 11:22:00 -0700 From: Josh Steadmon To: Junio C Hamano Cc: Jeff King , Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Schindelin , Jonathan Nieder , Jonathan Tan Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] Turn `git serve` into a test helper Message-ID: <20190417182200.GQ60888@google.com> Mail-Followup-To: Josh Steadmon , Junio C Hamano , Jeff King , Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Schindelin , Jonathan Nieder , Jonathan Tan References: <411587e4b80bd4e5a1cb9b1ec438cda7a0681465.1555070430.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> <20190417034621.GA19448@sigill.intra.peff.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On 2019.04.17 14:40, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jeff King writes: > > >> I do not personally think, as the design of v2 stands, a standalone > >> "serve" server that "can serve anything as long as it goes over > >> protocol v2" makes much sense, but perhaps those who have been doing > >> the v2 work may have different ideas, in which case let's hear what > >> their plans are. > > > > I too would like to hear more definite comments from people who think > > git-serve is worth keeping. In the meantime, there's some discussion > > from this thread in December: > > ... > > https://public-inbox.org/git/20181213195305.249059-1-jonathantanmy@google.com/ > > > > (In case you do not feel like reading the whole thing, my opinion there > > is that git-serve is probably not the right direction, and we would do > > well to demote it as Dscho's patch does). > > I guess we are more or less on the same page, then. I'll let others > chime in by waiting for a bit more but I won't wait forever ;-). > > Thanks. FWIW I used git-serve a fair amount while working on V2 support for archiving, and everything I did with it would have been just as easy with a test helper as with a builtin. So I have no objections to this change.