From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D54A31F461 for ; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 21:43:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728020AbfGRVn1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Jul 2019 17:43:27 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([104.130.231.41]:39810 "HELO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1727780AbfGRVn1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Jul 2019 17:43:27 -0400 Received: (qmail 30606 invoked by uid 109); 18 Jul 2019 21:43:27 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with SMTP; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 21:43:27 +0000 Authentication-Results: cloud.peff.net; auth=none Received: (qmail 21445 invoked by uid 111); 18 Jul 2019 21:44:24 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with (ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) SMTP; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 17:44:24 -0400 Authentication-Results: peff.net; auth=none Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 18 Jul 2019 17:43:25 -0400 Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2019 17:43:25 -0400 From: Jeff King To: Junio C Hamano Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Ulrich Windl Subject: Re: [PATCH] rm: resolving by removal is not a warning-worthy event Message-ID: <20190718214325.GA28619@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <5D2ED50D020000A100032435@gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de> <20190718202656.GC22038@sigill.intra.peff.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 02:07:23PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> + git rm qfwfq >msg && > >> + test_i18ngrep ! "needs merge" msg && > > > > Should we capture stderr from "git rm", too, to cover all bases? > > Do you mean > > git rm blob >msg 2>&1 > > because we could later change our mind and send "needs merge" > message to the standard error stream? Yes, exactly. -Peff