git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Hariom Verma via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Hariom Verma <hariom18599@gmail.com>,
	Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] git-compat-util.h: drop the `PRIuMAX` definition
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2019 12:06:43 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191124170643.GA16907@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <177deddcf83c2550c0db536a7a6942ba69a92fa5.1574600963.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>

On Sun, Nov 24, 2019 at 01:09:23PM +0000, Hariom Verma via GitGitGadget wrote:

> From: Hariom Verma <hariom18599@gmail.com>
> 
> Git's code base already seems to be using `PRIdMAX` without any such
> fallback definition for quite a while (75459410edd (json_writer: new
> routines to create JSON data, 2018-07-13), to be precise, and the
> first Git version to include that commit was v2.19.0).
> 
> Therefore it should be safe to drop the fallback definition for
> `PRIuMAX` in `git-compat-util.h`.

I noticed this recently, too, and wondered if it was time for a cleanup.

We do sometimes get portability reports more than a year after the
problem was introduced. But I think this one is pretty safe. PRIuMAX is
in C99, and we've been picking up other C99-isms without complaint.

I was curious what system originally spurred this. The PRIuMAX
definition was originally added in 3efb1f343a (Check for PRIuMAX rather
than NO_C99_FORMAT in fast-import.c., 2007-02-20). But it was replacing
a construct that was introduced in 579d1fbfaf (Add NO_C99_FORMAT to
support older compilers., 2006-07-30), which talks about gcc 2.95.
That's pretty ancient at this point.

> diff --git a/git-compat-util.h b/git-compat-util.h
> index 607dca7534..ba710cfa6c 100644
> --- a/git-compat-util.h
> +++ b/git-compat-util.h
> @@ -320,10 +320,6 @@ char *gitdirname(char *);
>  #define PATH_MAX 4096
>  #endif
>  
> -#ifndef PRIuMAX
> -#define PRIuMAX "llu"
> -#endif
> -

This part of the patch looks obviously correct. :) But...

>  #ifndef SCNuMAX
>  #define SCNuMAX PRIuMAX
>  #endif

Can we likewise ditch the fallback definition for SCNuMAX? And PRIu32,
etc? It seems likely any platform would either have all of them or none.

-Peff

  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-24 17:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-24 13:09 [PATCH 0/1] git-compat-util.h: drop the PRIuMAX definition Hariom Verma via GitGitGadget
2019-11-24 13:09 ` [PATCH 1/1] git-compat-util.h: drop the `PRIuMAX` definition Hariom Verma via GitGitGadget
2019-11-24 17:06   ` Jeff King [this message]
2019-11-24 17:40     ` Carlo Arenas
2019-11-24 20:15       ` Carlo Arenas
2019-11-25  2:24     ` Junio C Hamano
2019-11-25  2:45       ` Junio C Hamano
2019-11-25  9:34         ` Jeff King

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191124170643.GA16907@sigill.intra.peff.net \
    --to=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=hariom18599@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).