From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Hariom Verma via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Hariom Verma <hariom18599@gmail.com>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] git-compat-util.h: drop the `PRIuMAX` definition
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2019 12:06:43 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191124170643.GA16907@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <177deddcf83c2550c0db536a7a6942ba69a92fa5.1574600963.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
On Sun, Nov 24, 2019 at 01:09:23PM +0000, Hariom Verma via GitGitGadget wrote:
> From: Hariom Verma <hariom18599@gmail.com>
>
> Git's code base already seems to be using `PRIdMAX` without any such
> fallback definition for quite a while (75459410edd (json_writer: new
> routines to create JSON data, 2018-07-13), to be precise, and the
> first Git version to include that commit was v2.19.0).
>
> Therefore it should be safe to drop the fallback definition for
> `PRIuMAX` in `git-compat-util.h`.
I noticed this recently, too, and wondered if it was time for a cleanup.
We do sometimes get portability reports more than a year after the
problem was introduced. But I think this one is pretty safe. PRIuMAX is
in C99, and we've been picking up other C99-isms without complaint.
I was curious what system originally spurred this. The PRIuMAX
definition was originally added in 3efb1f343a (Check for PRIuMAX rather
than NO_C99_FORMAT in fast-import.c., 2007-02-20). But it was replacing
a construct that was introduced in 579d1fbfaf (Add NO_C99_FORMAT to
support older compilers., 2006-07-30), which talks about gcc 2.95.
That's pretty ancient at this point.
> diff --git a/git-compat-util.h b/git-compat-util.h
> index 607dca7534..ba710cfa6c 100644
> --- a/git-compat-util.h
> +++ b/git-compat-util.h
> @@ -320,10 +320,6 @@ char *gitdirname(char *);
> #define PATH_MAX 4096
> #endif
>
> -#ifndef PRIuMAX
> -#define PRIuMAX "llu"
> -#endif
> -
This part of the patch looks obviously correct. :) But...
> #ifndef SCNuMAX
> #define SCNuMAX PRIuMAX
> #endif
Can we likewise ditch the fallback definition for SCNuMAX? And PRIu32,
etc? It seems likely any platform would either have all of them or none.
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-24 17:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-24 13:09 [PATCH 0/1] git-compat-util.h: drop the PRIuMAX definition Hariom Verma via GitGitGadget
2019-11-24 13:09 ` [PATCH 1/1] git-compat-util.h: drop the `PRIuMAX` definition Hariom Verma via GitGitGadget
2019-11-24 17:06 ` Jeff King [this message]
2019-11-24 17:40 ` Carlo Arenas
2019-11-24 20:15 ` Carlo Arenas
2019-11-25 2:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-11-25 2:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-11-25 9:34 ` Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191124170643.GA16907@sigill.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=hariom18599@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).