From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18F1DC32771 for ; Sat, 4 Jan 2020 20:58:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D160E22B48 for ; Sat, 4 Jan 2020 20:58:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (3072-bit key) header.d=crustytoothpaste.net header.i=@crustytoothpaste.net header.b="ZgpDlz4N" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726204AbgADU6K (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Jan 2020 15:58:10 -0500 Received: from injection.crustytoothpaste.net ([192.241.140.119]:58916 "EHLO injection.crustytoothpaste.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726135AbgADU6K (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Jan 2020 15:58:10 -0500 Received: from camp.crustytoothpaste.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:b978:101:b610:a2f0:36c1:12e3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by injection.crustytoothpaste.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 93E6D60787; Sat, 4 Jan 2020 20:58:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=crustytoothpaste.net; s=default; t=1578171488; bh=jI3dMrOsZ8zaR4uAqxY4r0IxoM9RAqFAjsRouBPOXwc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Content-Type: Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:From:Reply-To:Subject:Date:To:CC: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:Content-Disposition; b=ZgpDlz4NV9oyiu4fWS2PMK1NIKyhwLOgFgfJx0KE2P0vbWJ+MbxpsXBM3qN/LSUt1 G2W3SoiBr+OGJevZJP4McF+HUxobY7uhObl+Fdx5It+dcnT2ds5zUqPT/nM52J8W8u adgOj6zWQy+96I9/jSb7E199ExEUZ56MwkTqlIatJoQINwZQubYoxlo7xRzjjzRGJM XkH0y8SwyxzeIkDT2tOE7+Pq3PvrgL7QGPLPnkSFSuBspky/dmqeKvuHHEHMi0n+tM 6NhpXw1vQVQE6jNWjB3KKNhlb/QJte+Oei5TDq2GQuCiA2lFbRhsIt3XlG9WXeCjzX pg3LrsrTD2vTSEPf6USwpHvnsWQP4sKuB7h2C6AdjSRbIezXyWBsqbovwLJMgh1UG+ 3dCuAhTJnrqjAP0ziT6D1a8hlboRuwHPClt/tmnxuEljAynpb/e62sU5OzOOXX8h7d oNLCKLTvtpBSVKXVouQ/Lb1tSUkoQ5152UadTsbr2MaH/84CApj Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2020 20:58:03 +0000 From: "brian m. carlson" To: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Testsuite failures on ppc64, sparc64 and s390x (64-bit BE) Message-ID: <20200104205803.GE6570@camp.crustytoothpaste.net> Mail-Followup-To: "brian m. carlson" , John Paul Adrian Glaubitz , git@vger.kernel.org References: <34ed7497-643e-5a38-d68c-7c075b647bcd@physik.fu-berlin.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="65ImJOski3p8EhYV" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <34ed7497-643e-5a38-d68c-7c075b647bcd@physik.fu-berlin.de> X-Machine: Running on camp using GNU/Linux on x86_64 (Linux kernel 5.3.0-3-amd64) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org --65ImJOski3p8EhYV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2020-01-04 at 20:14:31, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Hi! >=20 > It seems that git is failing its testsuite on all 64-bit Big-Endian targe= ts, > full build log can be found in [1]. There seem to be multiple failures. >=20 > The issue first showed with 2.25-rc1 [2]. This is interesting, because there are different failures on different platforms. s390x shows failures only in t9100, which is one of the svn tests. From the diff between rc0 and rc1, I don't see anything which should affect git-svn in that way. ppc64 and sparc64 failing a lot more tests, mostly due to segfaults, but =66rom a cursory glance they all appear to be SVN-related. Are we sure that some dependency of libsvn1 hasn't caused this problem? I noticed that all of the broken builds seem to have libserf-1-1 1.3.9-8, which appears to have received an overhaul recently. Of course, it could be something else as well. I got rid of my UltraSPARC hardware when I last moved, so I won't be looking into this further, but it seems unlikely to me that the problem is in Git when the only non-Windows C change between the two versions is a one-line file name change. --=20 brian m. carlson: Houston, Texas, US OpenPGP: https://keybase.io/bk2204 --65ImJOski3p8EhYV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.2.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEX8OngXdrJt+H9ww3v1NdgR9S9osFAl4Q/FsACgkQv1NdgR9S 9osXUw//Uq71VStVFabnwVASl79PrxNfbhLChTaTf5fwc4TvrpdHE0AmkSKy/bNL x5Bp9/BKXShUmNHfNw2p+SiDjUdUQKkO6iH4XBdZPruPPWcUm9P4yxjRP4TTm3AQ MlvOMFUXUH5MXTaaMhFdQUS4dEmKKxR5AGeJyQ3aB2Gty2dOU5bBYa71wJiq4WGp WUy5o5wE7BhJ87Q4ymihhgKQ+6N3mqv+HWIBeGnpeut++NqEBblSIOlO3c5tTVzG fFId1s0+K6bDCZmBhXRiP+d8R51xarqn+0FyBLsphNCEgZgmZ9T8w5YDzAgJUYpS qRxAAdV68UNytH/eEqH6Y7Bie62f3zSXIYa/3fIY8BttWGsm7mJpv/k9Td2IV/T/ s0kWp2ZB19oPtoAwmnhUOawwRNnibcnTDePpfqbxh1J12daLSXPmvgKbglAK/2HC uK5GDznQor/myf3OxqZdP00CX1Weg38HIKp8t4EHrh478QEdoy/Pw+q9f1Vd5thf J0xRRu62d/B6+ZovxFtZyFXO5SVPVqNhE1oz8VkxBED3agqrMUnw4E1qu+Df1raL cTNm2uYpfDCU367HUUsTB/PMMevgTP7cIWPFKVGhmdSJ7EV623uhq9rEgoDSj8EY C1ls9PYO+HfgkRIdjDvOwppLNLw94nkN544n7dbDnxRxkZU4jTY= =KKUv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --65ImJOski3p8EhYV--