git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bugreport: collect list of populated hooks
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 12:02:57 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200427190257.GA77802@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqsggs9ngo.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>

On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 09:52:07PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> 
> Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com> writes:
> 
> > Without a definitive list of hook names within the code, we compile our
> > own list from the documentation. This is likely prone to bitrot. To
> > reduce the amount of code humans need to read, we turn the list into a
> > string_list and iterate over it (as we are calling the same find_hook
> > operation on each string). However, since bugreport should primarily be
> > called by the user, the performance loss from massaging the string
> > seems acceptable.
> 
> In this iteration we no longer are collecting the hook names into
> string list, but just formating the findings in a strbuf, no?

Right - I'll fix the commit message for round 2.

> 
> > @@ -33,6 +35,53 @@ static void get_system_info(struct strbuf *sys_info)
> >  	get_libc_info(sys_info);
> >  }
> >  
> > +static void get_populated_hooks(struct strbuf *hook_info, int nongit)
> > +{
> > +	/*
> > +	 * NEEDSWORK: Doesn't look like there is a list of all possible hooks;
> > +	 * so below is a transcription of `git help hooks`. Later, this should
> > +	 * be replaced with some programmatically generated list (generated from
> > +	 * doc or else taken from some library which tells us about all the
> > +	 * hooks)
> > +	 */
> 
> Yes, I recall that we discussed adding some annotation to
> documentation and extracting this automatically.

Right, we did. I think I was hesitant to move on it because I had
https://lore.kernel.org/git/20200420235310.94493-1-emilyshaffer@google.com
on my back burner and wasn't sure how the hook architecture would look
afterwards.

I'm not sure I know the right way to move forward (which is why I left a
NEEDSWORK) - my strongest preference is to leave it as is and wait for
the linked RFC and related work to land, at which point this code will
need a rework anyways. But if we're very interested in generating an
enum or something from the docs rather than letting this gross char**
land, I can do that too.

 - Emily

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-27 19:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-24 23:38 [PATCH] bugreport: collect list of populated hooks Emily Shaffer
2020-04-25  0:30 ` Jonathan Nieder
2020-04-27 20:48   ` [PATCH] bugreport: drop time.h include Emily Shaffer
2020-04-27 21:03     ` Jonathan Nieder
2020-04-27 21:25       ` Junio C Hamano
2020-04-27 21:41         ` Junio C Hamano
2020-04-27 21:56           ` Emily Shaffer
2020-04-27 23:27             ` Junio C Hamano
2020-04-27 23:42     ` [PATCH v2] bugreport: drop extraneous includes Emily Shaffer
2020-04-27 23:46       ` Jonathan Nieder
2020-04-25  4:52 ` [PATCH] bugreport: collect list of populated hooks Junio C Hamano
2020-04-27 19:02   ` Emily Shaffer [this message]
2020-04-27 20:46     ` Junio C Hamano
2020-04-27 20:49       ` Emily Shaffer
2020-04-27 23:38 ` [PATCH v2] " Emily Shaffer
2020-04-27 23:45   ` Jonathan Nieder
2020-04-28  0:04     ` Junio C Hamano
2020-04-30  0:01     ` Emily Shaffer
2020-04-30  1:24   ` [PATCH v3] " Emily Shaffer
2020-04-30  1:50     ` Jonathan Nieder
2020-04-30  1:53       ` Jonathan Nieder
2020-04-30 17:44       ` Junio C Hamano
2020-04-30 22:09         ` Junio C Hamano
2020-05-07 21:08           ` Emily Shaffer
2020-05-07 23:06             ` Junio C Hamano
2020-05-11 21:26               ` Emily Shaffer
2020-05-08  0:53     ` [PATCH v4] " Emily Shaffer
2020-05-08  1:20       ` Junio C Hamano
2020-05-08  1:34       ` Đoàn Trần Công Danh
2020-05-11 21:22         ` Emily Shaffer
2020-05-11 22:14       ` [PATCH v5] " Emily Shaffer
2020-05-11 23:26         ` Jonathan Nieder
2020-05-11 23:45         ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200427190257.GA77802@google.com \
    --to=emilyshaffer@google.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).