From: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bugreport: collect list of populated hooks
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 12:02:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200427190257.GA77802@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqsggs9ngo.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 09:52:07PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com> writes:
>
> > Without a definitive list of hook names within the code, we compile our
> > own list from the documentation. This is likely prone to bitrot. To
> > reduce the amount of code humans need to read, we turn the list into a
> > string_list and iterate over it (as we are calling the same find_hook
> > operation on each string). However, since bugreport should primarily be
> > called by the user, the performance loss from massaging the string
> > seems acceptable.
>
> In this iteration we no longer are collecting the hook names into
> string list, but just formating the findings in a strbuf, no?
Right - I'll fix the commit message for round 2.
>
> > @@ -33,6 +35,53 @@ static void get_system_info(struct strbuf *sys_info)
> > get_libc_info(sys_info);
> > }
> >
> > +static void get_populated_hooks(struct strbuf *hook_info, int nongit)
> > +{
> > + /*
> > + * NEEDSWORK: Doesn't look like there is a list of all possible hooks;
> > + * so below is a transcription of `git help hooks`. Later, this should
> > + * be replaced with some programmatically generated list (generated from
> > + * doc or else taken from some library which tells us about all the
> > + * hooks)
> > + */
>
> Yes, I recall that we discussed adding some annotation to
> documentation and extracting this automatically.
Right, we did. I think I was hesitant to move on it because I had
https://lore.kernel.org/git/20200420235310.94493-1-emilyshaffer@google.com
on my back burner and wasn't sure how the hook architecture would look
afterwards.
I'm not sure I know the right way to move forward (which is why I left a
NEEDSWORK) - my strongest preference is to leave it as is and wait for
the linked RFC and related work to land, at which point this code will
need a rework anyways. But if we're very interested in generating an
enum or something from the docs rather than letting this gross char**
land, I can do that too.
- Emily
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-27 19:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-24 23:38 [PATCH] bugreport: collect list of populated hooks Emily Shaffer
2020-04-25 0:30 ` Jonathan Nieder
2020-04-27 20:48 ` [PATCH] bugreport: drop time.h include Emily Shaffer
2020-04-27 21:03 ` Jonathan Nieder
2020-04-27 21:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-04-27 21:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-04-27 21:56 ` Emily Shaffer
2020-04-27 23:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-04-27 23:42 ` [PATCH v2] bugreport: drop extraneous includes Emily Shaffer
2020-04-27 23:46 ` Jonathan Nieder
2020-04-25 4:52 ` [PATCH] bugreport: collect list of populated hooks Junio C Hamano
2020-04-27 19:02 ` Emily Shaffer [this message]
2020-04-27 20:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-04-27 20:49 ` Emily Shaffer
2020-04-27 23:38 ` [PATCH v2] " Emily Shaffer
2020-04-27 23:45 ` Jonathan Nieder
2020-04-28 0:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-04-30 0:01 ` Emily Shaffer
2020-04-30 1:24 ` [PATCH v3] " Emily Shaffer
2020-04-30 1:50 ` Jonathan Nieder
2020-04-30 1:53 ` Jonathan Nieder
2020-04-30 17:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-04-30 22:09 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-05-07 21:08 ` Emily Shaffer
2020-05-07 23:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-05-11 21:26 ` Emily Shaffer
2020-05-08 0:53 ` [PATCH v4] " Emily Shaffer
2020-05-08 1:20 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-05-08 1:34 ` Đoàn Trần Công Danh
2020-05-11 21:22 ` Emily Shaffer
2020-05-11 22:14 ` [PATCH v5] " Emily Shaffer
2020-05-11 23:26 ` Jonathan Nieder
2020-05-11 23:45 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200427190257.GA77802@google.com \
--to=emilyshaffer@google.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).