From: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "SZEDER Gábor" <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Apr 2020, #03; Tue, 28)
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 09:57:01 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200429155701.GA83442@syl.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqimhjyy9c.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 04:41:03PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> * tb/diff-tree-with-notes (2020-04-20) 1 commit
> (merged to 'next' on 2020-04-22 at c06610c916)
> + diff-tree.c: load notes machinery when required
>
> "git diff-tree --pretty --notes" used to hit an assertion failure,
> as it forgot to initialize the notes subsystem.
Thanks, I'm happy to see this merged.
> * tb/reset-shallow (2020-04-24) 2 commits
> (merged to 'next' on 2020-04-28 at 9510639ae8)
> + shallow.c: use '{commit,rollback}_shallow_file'
> + t5537: use test_write_lines and indented heredocs for readability
>
> Fix in-core inconsistency after fetching into a shallow repository
> that broke the code to write out commit-graph.
>
> Will merge to 'master'.
Likewise. I promised you and Jonathan Nieder a follow-up series in [1]
to move some of the declarations in commit.h to a new shallow.h, and to
introduce a 'struct shallow_lock'. I have those patches locally, but
I'll send them shortly.
> * tb/commit-graph-fd-exhaustion-fix (2020-04-24) 4 commits
> (merged to 'next' on 2020-04-28 at 6d5fd6bc49)
> + commit-graph: close descriptors after mmap
> + commit-graph.c: gracefully handle file descriptor exhaustion
> + t/test-lib.sh: make ULIMIT_FILE_DESCRIPTORS available to tests
> + commit-graph.c: don't use discarded graph_name in error
> (this branch uses tb/commit-graph-split-strategy.)
>
> The commit-graph code exhausted file descriptors easily when it
> does not have to.
>
> Will merge to 'master'.
I'm _very_ glad to see this one merged ;).
> * tb/commit-graph-perm-bits (2020-04-27) 6 commits
> - commit-graph.c: make 'commit-graph-chain's read-only
> - commit-graph.c: ensure graph layers respect core.sharedRepository
> - SQUASH??? force known umask if you are going to check the resulting mode bits
> - commit-graph.c: write non-split graphs as read-only
> - lockfile.c: introduce 'hold_lock_file_for_update_mode'
> - tempfile.c: introduce 'create_tempfile_mode'
>
> Some of the files commit-graph subsystem keeps on disk did not
> correctly honor the core.sharedRepository settings and some were
> left read-write.
>
> Expecting a reroll.
Reroll coming shortly, sorry about the trouble here.
> * tb/commit-graph-split-strategy (2020-04-15) 7 commits
> + commit-graph.c: introduce '--[no-]check-oids'
> + commit-graph.h: replace 'commit_hex' with 'commits'
> + oidset: introduce 'oidset_size'
> + builtin/commit-graph.c: introduce split strategy 'replace'
> + builtin/commit-graph.c: introduce split strategy 'no-merge'
> + builtin/commit-graph.c: support for '--split[=<strategy>]'
> + t/helper/test-read-graph.c: support commit-graph chains
> (this branch is used by tb/commit-graph-fd-exhaustion-fix.)
>
> "git commit-graph write" learned different ways to write out split
> files.
>
> Will merge to 'master'.
I know this series has been kind of a slog, but I would like to hold off
on the last patch to introduce '--no-check-oids' here. The other patches
all seem to be set (and were mostly already reviewed when I sent this
series for the first time), but the last patch still is under discussion
[2].
My thought is that we could either replace that patch with one to
silently ignore non-commits always, or keep it and rename it to
'--[no-]verify-oids' with some minor documentation changes.
In either case, the rest of the series is ready to merge, and other
topics depend on it, so I figure that we can merge the first 6 patches
and hold off on the last one for now.
Sound good?
Thanks,
Taylor
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/git/20200424171301.GB61470@syl.local/
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/git/20200424105957.GB5925@szeder.dev/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-29 15:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-28 23:41 What's cooking in git.git (Apr 2020, #03; Tue, 28) Junio C Hamano
2020-04-29 15:57 ` Taylor Blau [this message]
2020-04-29 16:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-04-29 16:55 ` Taylor Blau
2020-04-29 17:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-04-29 17:26 ` Taylor Blau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200429155701.GA83442@syl.local \
--to=me@ttaylorr.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=szeder.dev@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).