From: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] bugreport: collect list of populated hooks
Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 14:08:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200507210849.GH77802@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqwo5wpqvg.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 03:09:55PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
>
> >> When we do that, this "mkdir .git/hooks" will fail because the
> >> directory already exists. Ideas:
> >>
> >> A. Include a preparatory patch in this series that removes that "mv"
> >> command. That way, this test can do
> >
> > While I do not think it is realistic to anticipate that the "test"
> > repository may someday come with a hooks/ directory, even if we did
> > so, we would not enable any hook by default in there. So "move away
> > and restore" feels way overkill.
> >
> >> B. Run "git init" ourselves so we know what we're getting:
> >
> > That is certainly safer, and simpler. But perhaps the simplest
> > would be
> >
> > C. Use "mkdir -p .git/hooks" so we won't get affected.
>
> In the meantime, I added this SQUASH on top. I do not claim that
> this is the best solution, but the idea is to refuse to be affected
> by what is left in .git/hooks either by the test framework or
> earlier tests in the same test script file.
Thanks for the patience with the reply - like many of us, my attention
is being pulled many directions right now :)
This solution looks very neat to me, minus one comment. I can send a
squash with the change I mention below.
- Emily
>
> t/t0091-bugreport.sh | 11 +++++++----
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/t/t0091-bugreport.sh b/t/t0091-bugreport.sh
> index 612c12a918..9450cc02e3 100755
> --- a/t/t0091-bugreport.sh
> +++ b/t/t0091-bugreport.sh
> @@ -58,11 +58,14 @@ test_expect_success 'can create leading directories outside of a git dir' '
> '
>
> test_expect_success 'indicates populated hooks' '
> - test_when_finished rm git-bugreport-hooks.txt &&
> - test_when_finished rm -fr .git/hooks &&
I'm not sure it's necessary to lose these two lines. Especially the
generated bugreport I'd like to clean up.
> + rm -fr .git/hooks &&
> mkdir .git/hooks &&
> - write_script .git/hooks/applypatch-msg &&
> - write_script .git/hooks/prepare-commit-msg.sample &&
> + for hook in applypatch-msg prepare-commit-msg.sample
> + do
> + write_script ".git/hooks/$hook" <<-\EOF || return 1
> + echo "hook $hook exists"
> + EOF
> + done &&
I like this placeholder script a lot.
> git bugreport -s hooks &&
> grep applypatch-msg git-bugreport-hooks.txt &&
> ! grep prepare-commit-msg git-bugreport-hooks.txt
> --
> 2.26.2-447-gd61d20c9b4
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-07 21:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-24 23:38 [PATCH] bugreport: collect list of populated hooks Emily Shaffer
2020-04-25 0:30 ` Jonathan Nieder
2020-04-27 20:48 ` [PATCH] bugreport: drop time.h include Emily Shaffer
2020-04-27 21:03 ` Jonathan Nieder
2020-04-27 21:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-04-27 21:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-04-27 21:56 ` Emily Shaffer
2020-04-27 23:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-04-27 23:42 ` [PATCH v2] bugreport: drop extraneous includes Emily Shaffer
2020-04-27 23:46 ` Jonathan Nieder
2020-04-25 4:52 ` [PATCH] bugreport: collect list of populated hooks Junio C Hamano
2020-04-27 19:02 ` Emily Shaffer
2020-04-27 20:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-04-27 20:49 ` Emily Shaffer
2020-04-27 23:38 ` [PATCH v2] " Emily Shaffer
2020-04-27 23:45 ` Jonathan Nieder
2020-04-28 0:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-04-30 0:01 ` Emily Shaffer
2020-04-30 1:24 ` [PATCH v3] " Emily Shaffer
2020-04-30 1:50 ` Jonathan Nieder
2020-04-30 1:53 ` Jonathan Nieder
2020-04-30 17:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-04-30 22:09 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-05-07 21:08 ` Emily Shaffer [this message]
2020-05-07 23:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-05-11 21:26 ` Emily Shaffer
2020-05-08 0:53 ` [PATCH v4] " Emily Shaffer
2020-05-08 1:20 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-05-08 1:34 ` Đoàn Trần Công Danh
2020-05-11 21:22 ` Emily Shaffer
2020-05-11 22:14 ` [PATCH v5] " Emily Shaffer
2020-05-11 23:26 ` Jonathan Nieder
2020-05-11 23:45 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200507210849.GH77802@google.com \
--to=emilyshaffer@google.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).