From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, FREEMAIL_REPLYTO_END_DIGIT,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E29A8C433E2 for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 08:36:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B757B214DB for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 08:36:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=rambler.ru header.i=@rambler.ru header.b="NLivtkK7" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728559AbgFRIgr (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Jun 2020 04:36:47 -0400 Received: from huan9.mail.rambler.ru ([81.19.78.8]:38990 "EHLO huan9.mail.rambler.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728706AbgFRIgp (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Jun 2020 04:36:45 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rambler.ru; s=mail; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date; bh=o+kjAzMw9jZsa2zWmwwrAu390DkrtJQYYqELSxlfOjg=; b=NLivtkK7xF/6K+iD9TznBSHx6D H4faGgzz3OojvuzG7frOdv29WRvMUoZqQlcrmD7Ca292abpoHm2WmTCVCNzhhPRsyFvdH9SCydy/q L4b2x5oMOWMjYEPqaup987uGsgmVNyeu4mfwDOiUOHmilbAgPjDdHkZKs265vHNdYiLk=; Received: from [UNAVAILABLE] ([194.190.114.28]:54894 helo=localhost) by huan9.mail.rambler.ru with esmtpa (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jlq2N-0003M9-An for git@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 11:36:43 +0300 Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 11:38:25 +0300 From: Oleg To: Git Subject: Re: Rename offensive terminology (master) Message-ID: <20200618083825.GB20837@legohost> Reply-To: Oleg References: <20200614181906.u42tuny3eipvhd46@chatter.i7.local> <20200616074316.GA21462@kitsune.suse.cz> <20200617201037.GA86579@google.com> <20200617201709.GB86579@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) X-Rambler-User: lego_12239@rambler.ru/194.190.114.28 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 09:57:42AM +0200, demerphq wrote: > Ultimately if I was the decision maker here I would be choosing terms > that are as workflow agnostic as I can find. "main", "master" and > "primary" are not workflow agnostic, they are if anything a bit > workflow opinionated. "trunk" on the other hand seems pretty > self-descriptive and doesn't have much baggage. It's bark is worse > than its byte however. :-) The most workflow agnostic name is "branch". it is so neutral that you want to change it ASAP :-). -- Олег Неманов (Oleg Nemanov)