From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24001C43463 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 19:55:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0F5921D90 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 19:55:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726617AbgISTzv (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Sep 2020 15:55:51 -0400 Received: from injection.crustytoothpaste.net ([192.241.140.119]:34566 "EHLO injection.crustytoothpaste.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726518AbgISTzv (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Sep 2020 15:55:51 -0400 Received: from camp.crustytoothpaste.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:b978:101:b610:a2f0:36c1:12e3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by injection.crustytoothpaste.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49F4960457; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 19:55:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=crustytoothpaste.net; s=default; t=1600545349; bh=2jCxHCGS+tMvADEQ7o5mTT5r4ryXf75GuPXUTPBJHjA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Content-Type: Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:From:Reply-To:Subject:Date:To:CC: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:Content-Disposition; b=Im46Y/rG4LeleMFfVx+LswmjW/kkvjLhOTRxoZz1B6iz9ufepSksqW0HAd5oxzvr0 vLgd9wgBvi7Iqc/2Lq0ocMoUi/wCvO6VnehKps037PVrIjrzDGMha6d5owTk7VZy67 haBJebLHConhBwN4vwoXtt/4g6Z31KhfUeVXjYw8I0CUOma1I2drbjjcNZoNsd4fW4 lsPz+aWBjep6IZ5rXtnxnHXixPYkgWXxYcpbgRtrAf9V2pMOZulgNR2dgG0URfORZ6 bouBrPvHCrqYFvly2ahwRmG0ovfseGQU4kFwRJvV77jo0Zi6tER+qUrijrS8V6yNwY QdBRBxu1ERaWE/kfV5pvUJ9gcmjCaf9ht/O8ejY+wh2SVzMhUGQRCGyzeiNvBdcSyK uIdbpkjAaMDpif8+qGn9opjJL8XnWTUyif/n7taS1JZErG9UZrIy63NabzVLn1DveV /Gr9D69+DOSJD+HqGdFtwgEcp8IbfYzOXkAy1qE1WHboiYq4/To Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2020 19:55:45 +0000 From: "brian m. carlson" To: ronnie sahlberg Cc: Jonathan Nieder , Developer support list for Wireshark , git@vger.kernel.org, Emily Shaffer Subject: Re: Joint project with Git for outreachy Message-ID: <20200919195545.GH67496@camp.crustytoothpaste.net> Mail-Followup-To: "brian m. carlson" , ronnie sahlberg , Jonathan Nieder , Developer support list for Wireshark , git@vger.kernel.org, Emily Shaffer References: <20200918222103.GA3352870@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Rn7IEEq3VEzCw+ji" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.14.6 (2020-07-11) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org --Rn7IEEq3VEzCw+ji Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2020-09-19 at 09:12:53, ronnie sahlberg wrote: > Hi Jonathan, > Hi Emily >=20 > Emily, you want to contribute to wireshark? That is awesome. I think I > speak for everyone to send a HUGE welcome > your way and hope your experience working on and with wireshark be excell= ent! I think there's been a misunderstanding. I think the proposal was to have Emily and Jonathan, who are both significant contributors to Git, doing the mentoring from the Git side, along with someone from the Wireshark side. I don't think we know yet if anyone will be interested in working on it, but it seems from the response to be a proposal that has interest in both projects. Feel free to correct me if I've misunderstood. > I think a git dissector would be really awesome. > We do have a packet-git.c already in wireshark, but looking at it it > is very barebones (understatement of the year:-) > but getting a real full blown git protocol implementation would be > totally awesome. I agree that a Git dissector would be an awesome addition to Wireshark, for all the reasons mentioned, and I do hope someone is able to pick it up. I'd personally find such a feature very useful, and I know some colleagues who probably would as well. --=20 brian m. carlson: Houston, Texas, US --Rn7IEEq3VEzCw+ji Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.2.20 (GNU/Linux) iHUEABYKAB0WIQQILOaKnbxl+4PRw5F8DEliiIeigQUCX2ZiQAAKCRB8DEliiIei gfccAP9f7Pc74zHLEOjonaTfo8IedAyruzV/wFGrE3zGPqZmJAEAnPU1/j8gRpfe EReDvu3ZHFhPj2v2XTf4lnwOqlnNnw0= =yugp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Rn7IEEq3VEzCw+ji--