From: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Oct 2020, #01; Mon, 5)
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 01:07:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201007080735.GA2463829@generichostname> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqq8scj5d3n.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>
Hi Junio,
On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 01:11:24PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> * dl/diff-merge-base (2020-09-21) 10 commits
> - contrib/completion: complete `git diff --merge-base`
> - builtin/diff-tree: learn --merge-base
> - builtin/diff-index: learn --merge-base
> - t4068: add --merge-base tests
> - diff-lib: define diff_get_merge_base()
> - diff-lib: accept option flags in run_diff_index()
> - contrib/completion: extract common diff/difftool options
> - git-diff.txt: backtick quote command text
> - git-diff-index.txt: make --cached description a proper sentence
> - t4068: remove unnecessary >tmp
>
> "git diff A...B" learned "git diff --merge-base A B", which is a
> longer short-hand to say the same thing.
>
> Expecting a reroll.
> cf. <xmqqblhyepup.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>
I'd prefer to not reroll this and leave it over-restrictive than
under-restrictive if possible[0].
Looking back, I don't think I've explained this clearly enough. I
believe that you are looking at this from the perspective of a Git
developer where you know that diff is just a frontend for diff-index and
diff-tree. However, I believe the perspective of a user who doesn't
know/care about the implementation details, all they know about is the
documentation.
In the documentation for diff, the `git diff <A> <B>` and the `git diff
<A>..<B>` forms are documented in separate sections. Looking at it from
that perspective, it would make sense that `--merge-base` only applies
to the endpoint form and I don't think that users would detect any
inconsistencies there.
Thanks,
Denton
[0]: https://lore.kernel.org/git/20200926015256.GA136085@generichostname/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-07 8:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-06 20:11 What's cooking in git.git (Oct 2020, #01; Mon, 5) Junio C Hamano
2020-10-07 8:07 ` Denton Liu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201007080735.GA2463829@generichostname \
--to=liu.denton@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).